[NSRCA-discussion] NATS 2012

[Joe Lachowski]

I would think a  random 20% would be the best way to go. Speaking as the keeper of the marbles at the Worlds. LOL
 



Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:07:55 -0700
From: jgghome at comcast.net
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS 2012


Keep in mind that the weight rule is not applied at any local contests, only at the Nats.

Let's consider the Nats for a moment and assume the attendance is 100 spread out equally in four classes(not exactly the case but close enough)

Intermediate- Already gets a weight allowance and I didn't hear any complaints at the Nats so 100- 25 = 75
Advanced- Already gets a weight allowance. Again I heard no complaints so  75 - 25 = 50
F3A- we have no control over the application of weight rules for FAI particularly in a team selection year so 50 -25 = 25
Masters- This is the only class that has to adhere to 5000  grams under AMA rules. Most Masters pilots that go to the Nats are flying top of the line aircraft that do make weight anyway. I'm sure there are a few(less than a handful) nationally that did not go to the Nats because their plane would not make weight. Perhaps there is also a handful who did go that ONLY spent the money to make weight  so (25-20 = 5 )+ 5 =10

So we should change or ignore the rules at the Nats for a few Masters pilots that might not go to the Nats next year rather than spend the money to get their airplane to make weight? I don't think so. 
Perhaps Arch is a bit overboard with wanting to check every plane after every flight but weighing every plane at least once and checking the stickers after each flight seems very reasonable to me. In any case he has established very early that weighins will be done and has a plan in place on how to accomplish it. Much better than this past Nats where we told to make weight and then not checked at all.

John



_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20111213/ceafced4/attachment.html>