[NSRCA-discussion] Judging . . . . . .

[J N Hiller]

Thanks John I scanned one last night but thought the file size was too big
to send. One of the things I really like is the raw score average (center
right). If you kick the decimal point it becomes a percentage of maximum
(78%), a true indicator of performance.
Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of John Gayer
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 7:56 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging . . . . . .

Here's an example of the tear sheet provided by Gordon's program. Very
valuable info here.

John

On 12/9/2011 8:40 AM, Peter Vogel wrote:
Doesn't having a scoring system that allows for aggregated data analysis
help with judging the judges over time?

Peter+

Sent from my iPhone4S

On Dec 9, 2011, at 7:04 AM, Bob Kane < getterflash at yahoo.com
<mailto:getterflash at yahoo.com> > wrote:
Personally, I think we need to continue to focus of the quality of judging
before we get too distracted on automated score entry.

2 - Know the rules
3 - Apply the rules
4 - Be consistent

Bob Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com <mailto:getterflash at yahoo.com>
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion




_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20111209/47718216/attachment.html>