[NSRCA-discussion] Judge Rank, 2010 F3A and Masters Finals
Mark Hunt
flyintexan at att.net
Tue Oct 5 03:25:33 AKDT 2010
Matt,
Thank you for the explanation. The ranking as it stands is a very good system. If improvement is possible, I'm confident someone will find a method to do so.
-mark
----- Original Message -----
From: rcmaster199 at aol.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 05:26
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judge Rank, 2010 F3A and Masters Finals
Mark and all,
Judge Ranking program doesn't account for one judge seeing a 10 and another seeing a zero. From the judge's perspective, each is right. The calculations respect each judge's score equally.
One "low" judge can sometimes be on the same panel as 4 "high" judges and vice versa. Who is right? That situation will skew the data and all judges will be ranked lower than if a panel was more consistent.
Any of the rankings I've posted, judges are ranked respective to their peers on any given panel, because the whole panel was used to place the pilots for any round, officially. Judge Rank doesn't get to pick and choose; it plays no favorites.
As RVP, Tony, Don and I have said over the years, this program was never cast in stone. If there is a better way, maybe we can improve the program.
Regards
MattK
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Hunt <flyintexan at att.net>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Mon, Oct 4, 2010 10:33 pm
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judge Rank, 2010 F3A and Masters Finals
yes. Nice work. my only beef with judge ranking is..what if the minority is getting it right?......how many of the majority really downgrade for distance?..;)
----- Original Message -----
From: rcmaster199 at aol.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 22:15
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judge Rank, 2010 F3A and Masters Finals
Hey,
Did this get through the frst time??
-----Original Message-----
From: rcmaster199 at aol.com
To: rcmaster199 at aol.com; nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Mon, Oct 4, 2010 2:57 pm
Subject: Judge Rank, 2010 F3A and Masters Finals
Just finished the calculations from 2010 for both F3A and Masters Finals. Now I need to edit the website to bring everything to date:
F3A, 2 rounds flown; F11 plus unknown
Dale Arnold Rd 1= 927.2------rd2 = 883.8
Mark Radcliff Rd1= 870.2------rd2 = 879.5
Derek Koopowitz Rd 1= 869
Mike Harrison Rd1= 825.6
Rusty Dose Rd 1 =806.7
Mark Atwood Rd 2=914.2
Bill Ahrens Rd2=837.1
Tom Miller Rd2=890.1
Masters, 3 rounds flown:
Don Ramsey Rd 1= 911.1-----------Rd 2= 873.6
Tony Romano Rd 1= 904.5-----------Rd 2=899.1
Ed Alt Rd 1= 893.1-----------Rd 2=811.0
Carlos Barrera Rd 1= 838.9-----------Rd 2=809.7
Joe Dunnaway Rd 1= 792.2-----------Rd 2=748.7
Round 3
Rick Wallace Rd 3 = 861.9
RVP Rd 3 = 782.2
Gary Courtney Rd 3 = 770.7
John Fuqua Rd 3 = 753.7
Christopher Moon Rd 3 = 717.8
When we first started to do these calculations some 7 years ago, the judges were hard pressed to get an average score in the 900s. But now we have had several do that and a couple more than once.
We've actually had a few judges score the Placement part of the calculation,1000 points, which means they placed every pilot in the correct order per the official score. It has also become clear that certain judges consistently score the Scoring part of the calculation in the 900's which means they are closer to the average score than the other judges. Both of these feats are hard to do consistenctly since the judging panels change as much as they do
Kudos to all for your consistency and dilligence
Regards,
MattK
On Sep 22, 2010, at 10:26 PM, rcmaster199 at aol.com wrote:
> Judge Rankings from the F3A Finals in 2009. Will be calculating the > 2010 and posting soon
>
>
> Rounds 1 and 2
>
> JFuqua 744.9 805.0
> BKane 853.8 786.1
> DRamsey 853.0 871.2
> RWallace 818.9 845.3
> CBarrera 799.6 885.2
>
>
> Rounds 3 and 4
>
> DArnold 981.2 889.6
> MAtwood 870.8 895.2
> ABouchard 848.9 826.2
> EHaury 912.8 906.7
> KVelez 904.5 983.2
>
> Regards
>
> MattK
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rcmaster199 at aol.com
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Sent: Fri, Sep 17, 2010 10:45 pm
> Subject: Judge Rank, 2009 Masters Final
>
> Judge Rankings from 2009 Masters Final. Belated information for > inquiring minds; This will be on the NSRCA website at some point, > as I complete the assessment:
>
> Judge: Scores
> R Lewis 879.0 875.2
> G Miller 824.3 804.2
> J Lowe 720.8 861.4
> T Romano 778.9 946.0
> M Hunt 757.1 769.8
> B Clemmons 903.8 785.1
> J Dunnaway 783.7 816.8
> J Lechowski 787.3 843.1
> RVP 877.2 781.3
> T Terrenoiser 884.6 866.9
>
> Note: First 5 judges judged rounds 1 and 2; the last 5, rounds 3 and 4
>
> Regards,
>
> MattK
>
> =
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20101005/f46bd495/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list