[NSRCA-discussion] Masters Pattern the long and short

[Joe Lachowski]

I think we have a pretty good document put together for sequence development now. I guess the board will have to establish a permanent Sequence committee much like the Judging Committee.
 


Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:26:44 -0400
From: rickwallace45 at gmail.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters Pattern the long and short


Agree that the short sequence makes better sense overall. If we decide we hate it, we can change it again in two years. 
 
** A procedural question -- It looks like the Pattern sequences will be removed from the rulebook as a result of current rules proposals. Would love to hear what the NSRCA will put in place for sequence management, maneuver descriptions, etc. 
 
 
Rick Wallace


On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Don Ramsey <donramsey at gmail.com> wrote:




After flying the long and short proposed Masters pattern for 2011, I’m in favor of the short one.  In our district there can be 12+ Masters pilots at a contest.  This is a very long sit in the judging chair for the judges and they may be needed more than once.  If you just want to fly that can be done in practice but don’t make the judges suffer through the long sequence for that reason.  Think about how you would like to judge the long pattern if there were 14 pilots flying. Electric guys will also be easier on the batteries.
 
My opinion,
Don
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100728/b1f28491/attachment.html>