[NSRCA-discussion] Masters Pattern the long and short

[richard wallace]

Agree that the short sequence makes better sense overall. If we decide we
hate it, we can change it again in two years.

** A procedural question -- It looks like the Pattern sequences will be
removed from the rulebook as a result of current rules proposals. Would love
to hear what the NSRCA will put in place for sequence management, maneuver
descriptions, etc.


Rick Wallace

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Don Ramsey <donramsey at gmail.com> wrote:

>  After flying the long and short proposed Masters pattern for 2011, I’m in
> favor of the short one.  In our district there can be 12+ Masters pilots at
> a contest.  This is a very long sit in the judging chair for the judges and
> they may be needed more than once.  If you just want to fly that can be done
> in practice but don’t make the judges suffer through the long sequence for
> that reason.  Think about how you would like to judge the long pattern if
> there were 14 pilots flying. Electric guys will also be easier on the
> batteries.
>
>
>
> My opinion,
>
> Don
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100728/25260fc2/attachment.html>