[NSRCA-discussion] S.bus

[ronlock at comcast.net]

A wireless buddy box was being marketed by a vendor at NEAT fair last year. 
I don't recall the name. 

Ron Lockhart 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Fuqua" <johnfuqua at embarqmail.com> 
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Sent: Friday, July 9, 2010 4:10:59 PM 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus 




Actually I think Futaba now has a wireless buddy box available. 





From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Atwood, Mark 
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:23 PM 
To: General pattern discussion 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus 



I’ve been saying that for years…if only we could have wireless power we’d be there. 



I’d also like to see Bluetooth Buddy Box systems. 




Mark Atwood 

Paragon Consulting, Inc. | President 

5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio, 44124 

Phone: 440.684.3101 x102 | Fax: 440.684.3102 

mark.atwood at paragon-inc.com | www.paragon-inc.com 





From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of John Fuqua 
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:06 PM 
To: 'General pattern discussion' 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus 



What would be really cool is a system with wireless servos. Sort of a mini Wi-Fi hotspot. Now that would be really useful. 




From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jon Lowe 
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 10:09 AM 
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus 



There is a great article on latency here: 





http://www.rcmodelreviews.com/what_is_latency.shtml 





A lot of people are hung up on transmitter/receiver latency numbers, and don't see the whole picture. This gives as good a fact based write up as any I've seen. 


Jon Lowe 




-----Original Message----- 
From: John Fuqua <johnfuqua at embarqmail.com> 
To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Sent: Fri, Jul 9, 2010 8:48 am 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus 
How fast is anyone able to practically see a faster "command repetition rate" anyway and relate it to some surface movement???   We are all ready at instantaneous -----Original Message----- From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [ mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org ] On Behalf Of Ed Alt Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 8:03 AM To: General pattern discussion Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus Not only could the command repetition rate be increased, but you now have a comms bus that will support duplex communication.  This is a great way to add telemetry devices. Ed -------------------------------------------------- From: "James Oddino" < joddino at socal.rr.com > Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:26 AM To: "General pattern discussion" < nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus > I was thinking that maybe now without the pulse width interface, they > could have three times the rep rate with a digital interface, but who > knows.  There was a time when I knew what was going on inside RC systems > so I could decide what was best.  Futaba doesn't seem to care, or maybe > the marketing guys don't know what is important. > > Jim > > > On Jul 8, 2010, at 8:10 PM, Ed Alt wrote: > >> The only thing I would want to see is a redundant connection option.  As >> neat as the single bus is, one connection failure at the serial driver >> source does you in no matter what.  Some redundancy is really needed to >> make this have more appeal IMO.  Still a really good step forward though. >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Bill's Email" < wemodels at cox.net > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 5:02 PM >> To: "General pattern discussion" < nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org > >> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] S.bus >> >>> There is a whole page of info as well on the Futaba FASST Site: >>> >>> http://2.4gigahertz.com/sbus/index.html >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list >>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org >>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion >> _______________________________________________ >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion > > _______________________________________________ > NSRCA-discussion mailing list > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion > _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100710/5304606c/attachment.html>