[NSRCA-discussion] S.bus

[Phil Spelt]

As a Psychologist, I agree with you, Bill.  As an R/C pattern jockey, 
I will only point out that the electronic latency is ADDED TO the 
wet-ware latency...

Thus, your last statement is true, indeed!

At 11:19 AM 7/9/2010, you wrote:
>I am amused by discussions about latency. We have long discussions 
>about the perceived advantages of single digit differences in system 
>latency while ignoring the fact that the average human reaction time 
>(call it organic latency) is around 250 milliseconds.
>
>I guess you can argue that since we are inherently so slow we need 
>all the electronic help we can get!!
>
>
>
>
>
>Jon Lowe wrote:
>>There is a great article on latency here:
>>
>><http://www.rcmodelreviews.com/what_is_latency.shtml>http://www.rcmodelreviews.com/what_is_latency.shtml
>>
>>A lot of people are hung up on transmitter/receiver latency 
>>numbers, and don't see the whole picture.  This gives as good a 
>>fact based write up as any I've seen.
>>
>>Jon Lowe
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-->There are only two types of aircraft -- fighters and targets.

Phil Spelt, Past President, Knox County Radio Control Society, Inc.
        URL: http://www.kcrctn.com
AMA--1294,  Scientific Leader Member  SPA--177, Board Member
       My URL: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/~chuenkan/
       (865) 435-1476 v  (865) 604-0541 c  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100709/3cee144f/attachment.html>