[NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes

[Atwood, Mark]

Hello?  That's POISONOUS nut!

Wolverines - Breakfast of Champions!!!!

GO BUCKS!!
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


----- Original Message -----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Fri Jan 01 23:37:29 2010
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes

Buckeye - Look in the dictionary.  It says " a worthless nut".

Ron Van Putte
BS - Purdue; MS and A&AE - Michigan

On Jan 1, 2010, at 8:47 PM, Budd Engineering wrote:

> Hey Mark,
>
> Are those squirrels (the steroid enhanced gray ones) available.  I  
> thought they all were playing for the Buckeyes?!!
>
> : )
>
> (Happy New Year!!)
>
> Jerry
>
> Budd Engineering
> jerry at buddengineering.com
> http://www.buddengineering.com
>
> On Jan 1, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Atwood, Mark wrote:
>
>> I think we ought to make a weight change to encourage squirril  
>> power.  Its "green" with biodegradable emissions, but right now I  
>> can only get adequate power with the heavier bulky steriod  
>> enhanced grey squirrils which make me overweight ...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------
>> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <nsrca-discussion- 
>> bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
>> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Fri Jan 01 20:47:46 2010
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>>
>> Making weight with an SAP-180 is easier than with a YS 170 CDI.   
>> The power doesn’t compare, but from a weight perspective, it's no  
>> real issue.
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> From: Daniel McLalin <mailto:dmclalin at gmail.com>
>> Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 8:35 PM
>> To: General pattern discussion <mailto:nsrca- 
>> discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>>
>>
>> 		John,
>> 	
>>
>> I just happened to read the discussion on RCU about the SAP 140  
>> and it occurred to me that maybe this is why raising the weight  
>> limit should be considered.  This does not mean I agree, but just  
>> for thought.
>>
>> 		, electrics want a weight break because their fuel tanks are  
>> heavy but their fuel is light; because two strokes aren't  
>> competitive any more we ought to have a high minimum weight for 4- 
>> strokes and electrics to level the playing field; and I want a  
>> weight break because I added 4 oz when I put ignition on my YS's.
>> 	
>> 	Pandora's box is no problem compared to changing pattern rules.
>> 	
>>
>> 	Jon Lowe
>>
>>
>> 	-----Original Message-----
>> 	From: Daniel McLalin <dmclalin at gmail.com>
>> 	To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> 	Sent: Fri, Jan 1, 2010 5:41 pm
>> 	Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>> 	
>> 	
>> 	Maybe if the weight limit was raised gas engines would become  
>> viable for pattern?
>> 	--
>> 	Regards,
>> 	Daniel McLalin
>> 	____________________
>> 	Of all the things I ever  
>> lost....................................... I miss my mind the most!
>> 	
>> 	www.firehow.com <http://www.firehow.com/>
>> 	www.premierbowlers.com <http://www.premierbowlers.com/>
>> 	
>> 	_______________________________________________
>> 	
>> 	
>> 	NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> 	
>> 	NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> 	
>> 	http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> 	
>> 	
>> 	
>> 	_______________________________________________
>> 	NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> 	NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> 	http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> 	
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>> Daniel McLalin
>> ____________________
>> Of all the things I ever  
>> lost....................................... I miss my mind the most!
>>
>> www.firehow.com
>> www.premierbowlers.com
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion