[NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes

[Daniel McLalin]

Mark,
No offense has been taken.  I also saw the humor in the weight restrictions,
which is why I mentioned gas engines.

On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Atwood, Mark <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>wrote:

> Its been brought to my attention that the person who re-initiated this
> topic is new.  I have to apologize. It was not my intent to offend or seem
> condescending in my reply. I was just trying to have a little fun with the
> topic since its been discussed so intently in the past.
>
> Please accept my apologies.
>
> -Mark
>
>
> --------------------------
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
> To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Fri Jan 01 22:13:03 2010
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>
> Sorry for being too brief –
>
>
>
> EDF is Electric Ducted Fan.
>
>
>
> Dave (Lockhart)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Vicente "Vince"
> Bortone
> Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 10:11 PM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>
>
>
> Dave,
>
>
>
> Someone has to ask first.  Probably you are waiting now.  What is EDF?
>
> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave" <DaveL322 at comcast.net>
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 1, 2010 8:58:03 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>
> Turbines could be cool!!!!  How about EDF??
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Atwood,
> Mark
> Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 9:41 PM
> To: 'nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org'
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>
> I tried flying squirrels but after numerous labor conflicts over who gets
> to
> do the flying I was forced to make an executive decision and make a change.
>
>
> Unfortunately the pecan/stick method, while providing adequate power, was
> unsustainable for long sequences. Moreover, only the steroid squirrels were
> able to endure the back to back practice flights without shorting their
> overall life cycle.
>
> Anyone wanna try a Turbine?
> --------------------------
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Fri Jan 01 21:45:19 2010
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
>
> You need to use pecans not steroids. Squirrels will do anything for
> pecans and the only additional weight penalty is one pecan on a stick.
> Of course you do need to reward the squirrel with extras after the
> flight which does not count against your weight limit. Also a switch to
> flying squirrels would be a plus. Then you actually get some lift from
> from your propulsion unit.
>
>  Atwood, Mark wrote:
> > I think we ought to make a weight change to encourage squirril power.
>  Its
> "green" with biodegradable emissions, but right now I can only get adequate
> power with the heavier bulky steriod enhanced grey squirrils which make me
> overweight ...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------
> > Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>
> > To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> > Sent: Fri Jan 01 20:47:46 2010
> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
> >
> > Making weight with an SAP-180 is easier than with a YS 170 CDI.  The
> power
> doesn't compare, but from a weight perspective, it's no real issue.
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > From: Daniel McLalin <mailto:dmclalin at gmail.com>
> > Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 8:35 PM
> > To: General pattern discussion <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
> >
> >
> >                 John,
> >
> >
> > I just happened to read the discussion on RCU about the SAP 140 and it
> occurred to me that maybe this is why raising the weight limit should be
> considered.  This does not mean I agree, but just for thought.
> >
> >                 , electrics want a weight break because their fuel tanks
> are
> heavy but their fuel is light; because two strokes aren't competitive any
> more we ought to have a high minimum weight for 4-strokes and electrics to
> level the playing field; and I want a weight break because I added 4 oz
> when
> I put ignition on my YS's.
> >
> >         Pandora's box is no problem compared to changing pattern rules.
> >
> >
> >         Jon Lowe
> >
> >
> >         -----Original Message-----
> >         From: Daniel McLalin <dmclalin at gmail.com>
> >         To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >         Sent: Fri, Jan 1, 2010 5:41 pm
> >         Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes
> >
> >
> >         Maybe if the weight limit was raised gas engines would become
> viable
> for pattern?
> >         --
> >         Regards,
> >         Daniel McLalin
> >         ____________________
> >         Of all the things I ever
> lost.......................................
> I miss my mind the most!
> >
> >         www.firehow.com <http://www.firehow.com/>
> >         www.premierbowlers.com <http://www.premierbowlers.com/>
> >
> >         _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >         NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >
> >         NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >
> >         http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >
> >
> >
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >         NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >         http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>  _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>



-- 
Regards,
Daniel McLalin
____________________
Of all the things I ever lost....................................... I miss
my mind the most!

www.firehow.com
www.premierbowlers.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100102/5ab76ea2/attachment.html>