[NSRCA-discussion] Figure M question P-11
Richard Strickland
pamrich47 at hotmail.com
Wed Feb 24 09:35:08 AKST 2010
Must be from the olden days--as I just went through the FAI Sporting Code and could not find reference to it. I must have been mistaken. I'll follow the Aresti diagram.
Richard
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:17:33 -0800
From: bob at toprudder.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Figure M question P-11
Where did you read that? I'm not all that up to date on the rules, but that is the first I've heard of having to roll in alternate directions.
--- On Wed, 2/24/10, Richard Strickland <pamrich47 at hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi Guys,
It seems that I read we are supposed to roll in opposite directions in each element of a maneuver. If you do that in the M--it doesn't work. Anyone have a definitive explanation how to perform this cutie? If each 'element' would be defined as each up and down leg combined--no problem.
Richard
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up now.
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469228/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20100224/427f5306/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list