[NSRCA-discussion] "Sick" Lipo Packs
Ron Van Putte
vanputte at cox.net
Sat Dec 4 20:00:48 AKST 2010
Yeah. Now my head feels like my belly felt on Thanksgiving afternoon.
However, it begs the question of what over discharging or discharging
too quickly actually is. I can understand going past the mah rating
as over discharging. Can discharging to 75%, 85% or 95% of the mah
rating be considered over discharging, if the rate of discharge is
under the C rating?
Ron VP
On Dec 4, 2010, at 8:21 PM, John Fuqua wrote:
> First good explanation of why Lipos swell that I have seen. Thanks
> for the insight.
>
>
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-
> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Chris
> Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2010 7:37 PM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] "Sick" Lipo Packs
>
>
>
> Stu is right, all cells in the pack were subjected to the same
> overcharge or over discharge and will also fail as the first cell
> did. One event will probably not show up as a swelled cell but it
> is the overcharge / over discharge over many cycles that will
> result in swelling. Notice the article says that max voltage is
> temp related, and most chargers don't make this adjustment so even
> with a "good" balance charger, you can still overcharge.
>
> Chris
>
> Part of a good article:
>
> This was the common problem with many cheap Chinese LiPos of around
> 2005-2008. Most are better now, but it's the #1 cause of premature
> LiPo failure: water contamination in the plant. Many of China's
> LiPo factories are on the coast, where the altitude is very low and
> the humidity is high. You can't run the humidity too low on the
> assembly floor, because you're working with volatile chemicals that
> could explode in the presence of a spark, and you can't run it too
> high because then you end up with a worthless LiPo that swells on
> first use.
>
> Here's the science. You have three ingredients that are functional
> in a LiPo battery. The rest is wrapping and wiring attachments.
>
> Cathode: LiCoO2 or LiMn2O4
> Separator: Conducting polymer electrolyte
> Anode: Li or carbon-Li intercalation compound
> I'm going to be a little vague in my language here. The chemicals
> involved vary according to manufacturers, so I don't want to make
> any assumptions.
>
> Remember your chemistry class? Note the absolute lack of any
> hydrogen atoms in the reaction. None, zero, zip, nada. If you have
> water inside your battery -- and virtually all batteries have a
> little bit -- you've got problems. When the chemical bond of H20 is
> broken by electrolysis and heat, you end up with free oxygen. You
> also have free-roaming hydrogen that typically ends up bound to
> your anode or cathode, whichever side of the reaction it's on and
> depending on the state of charge of your battery.
>
> Now, this is a pretty unstable situation that's exacerbated by any
> over-discharge or over-charge condition creating metallic lithium
> in your cell. The end result is Lithium Hydroxide: 1 atom of
> lithium, one atom of hydrogen, and one atom of oxygen.
>
> But you still have a free oxygen atom floating around inside the
> battery casing, that typically combines with one other oxygen atom
> -- O2, or what we sometimes think of as "air" -- or two other
> oxygen atoms, to form a characteristic tangy, metallic-smelling
> substance called "ozone", or O3. Gases expand with heat and
> contract with cold. Chuck a swollen battery in the freezer and it
> might come out rock-hard again... until it heats up. It's not
> frozen, it just got cold enough that the gases inside didn't take
> up much space at all.
>
> And that free O2 or ozone is just waiting to pounce and oxidize
> some lithium on the slightest miscalculation on your part. The
> modest over-discharge during a punch-out, or running the battery a
> little too low or letting it get a little too hot, or running the
> voltage up to 4.235v/cell on a cold day when the actual voltage
> limit per cell is more like 4.1v. All of these create the perfect
> storm for a puffy battery to quickly turn itself into a ruined
> battery or an in-flight fire.
>
> Understanding the role of free oxygen in your battery, from water
> and other causes, is CRUCIAL to understanding why batteries fail,
> and why sometimes you can get by with flying a puffy battery, and
> sometimes you can't.
>
> If a Lithium battery is overcharged or charged too quickly, you end
> up with LOTS of excess free lithium on the anode (metallic lithium
> plating), and free oxygen on the cathode. A free oxygen atom is
> small enough to freely traverse the separator without carrying an
> electric charge, resulting in lithium OXIDE on the anode. Lithium
> "rust", in reality. Useless to us at this point, just dead weight
> being carted around inside your battery's wrapper.
>
> But lithium oxide uses fewer oxygen atoms than existed in the
> ionized state, so you end up with, again, FREE OXYGEN. And people
> wonder why if you over-charge a LiPo underwater, it still ignites
> despite the lack of open air...
>
> If it's over-discharged or discharged too quickly, the reverse is
> true, but you end up with Lithium Oxide on the cathode, but at a
> lower rate because there's simply less there. Basically, an abused
> battery quickly develops corrosion on both poles of the battery
> inside the wrapper. And the more it's abused, the worse it gets as
> the resistance goes up and it still gets driven hard.
>
> This, by the way, is the most common cause of swelling today for
> our aircraft when flown with a high-quality pack (not knock-off
> eBay leftovers from expensive Chinese mistakes of 2004-2009). The
> reality is, these kinds of cells, regardless of their 'C' rating,
> are built for use where they last for several hours... not several
> minutes. While the chemistry if used as designed is good for
> thousands of cycles, we're driving them so far out of spec that
> we're lucky to get hundreds of cycles out of them.
>
> In most cases, too, our batteries are under-specced. If slow-
> charged and slow-discharged, many of these packs would often hold
> considerably more mAh than we think they do. That's one of the
> reasons we get the performance we do from them. Higher-C-rated
> packs also often introduce gelled electrolyte into the separator,
> and carbon or phosphorous nano-structures on the anode and cathode
> mixtures rather than the "pound it out thin and hope it's mixed
> right" approach used with sheets of anodes & cathodes today.
>
>
>
> On 12/4/2010 8:23 PM, Stuart Chale wrote:
>
> Been there done that but my experience is that before long
> additional cells will fail and the cycle will continue. With the
> cost of the lower priced packs, ie: Zippy's I would no longer
> bother :)
>
> On 12/4/2010 6:45 PM, Ron Van Putte wrote:
>
>
> Those of you who use lithium polymer battery packs to power their
> competition airplanes are familiar with "puffed" packs. I recently
> had four elderly 5S packs "puff". We all know that's not good, but
> what I'd like to know is what's actually happening.
>
> I know it's probably not wise for consumers to take lithium polymer
> packs apart, but that's exactly what I did with four packs. I
> discovered that in three of the "puffed" packs, only a single cell
> was "puffed". In the last pack, there were two "puffed cells. I
> did a little arithmetic and quickly discovered that I could make
> three "unpuffed" packs from the good cells I had. So, I unsoldered
> the "puffed" cells from the four packs and cannibalized one pack to
> make three 5S packs from what I had left. This process is
> obviously for the timid or the careless. I was careful and had no
> mishaps. However, I would suggest that anyone who says "Oops" a
> lot should not attempt doing this.
>
> The three 5S packs I have left are "rock solid". Experienced
> electric-pilots will know just what I mean.
>
> I have flown these packs and they seem to perform just as they did
> in their "youth".
>
> My questions are: Why do lithium polymer cells "puff"? What is
> the likely future of my recovered 5S packs?
>
> Ron VP
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list