[NSRCA-discussion] Graphtech F3A Gear

[Koenig, Tom]

Hi  Mike and others,
I am trying to track down some remaining Bolly stock locally-but if that fails, I'll be ordering the Graphtech, which is the most likely scenario!

A Partner? I thought I was the last remaining soul who had some new PL kits left over!!!

Thanks

Tom Koenig

________________________________
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of MKMSG
Sent: Wednesday, 9 September 2009 8:50 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Graphtech F3A Gear

Tom:  I just installed the GraphTech F3A gear in my Partner.  The gear is basically the same shape and length as the Bolly Long but with a bit less sweep back.  It will provide more than adequate clearance for any prop you'll use on an electric pattern model.  It appears very strong and has a very glossy finish.  The weight is just a few grams more than my Bolly Long.  I would purchase it again.

Mike

________________________________
************************************************************************
*PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may
be confidential. If received in error, please delete all
copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or
dissemination of this email or its attachments is
prohibited without the consent of the sender.

WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep
outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty
is given that this email or its attachments are virus free.
Before opening or using attachments, please check for
viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any
affected attachments.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender expressly,
and with authority, states them to be the views of the
organisation.
************************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090909/102c0ad1/attachment.html>