[NSRCA-discussion] Speaking of the 2011 Worlds at Muncie . . . . .
Anthony Frackowiak
frackowiak at sbcglobal.net
Thu Sep 3 08:10:07 AKDT 2009
Seems like the cart before the horse. I would have thought that any
bid presented to the CIAM for the WC would have already identified key
management personnel.
Tony
On Sep 3, 2009, at 8:21 AM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:
> If anyone has been reading my articles in the K-Factor you will see
> that we have been looking for an event manager for the WC's for
> almost 6 months now... no one has stepped forward.
>
> I've seen some comments on this list from several people that
> obviously know what it takes to run a world championship so my
> challenge to you all is this - step up and take the event manager
> job and run the event the proper way. If you don't want to be the
> event manager for the event (not CD it but plan it) then please
> offer your services to help plan the event with the selected event
> manager so that it can be the best world championship. The Nats is
> a standalone event and will remain as such. It has its own event
> director and core group of volunteers that help each and every year.
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:54 AM, michael s harrison <drmikedds at sbcglobal.net
> > wrote:
> My thoughts and opinion. First of all, the Nats is being treated as
> if it is just a local, fly for fun, whatever event. The Nats is a
> national event where the best in the US and those from any other
> country competes for the National title. This is the biggest
> competition in the United States. It is also the best competitive
> pattern event the US, possibly in the world. There are a core group
> of individuals that make all that possible. The event has evolved,
> grown and matured over the course of many years. It works very
> well. I would be very cautious about doing any major upheaval to
> that event.
>
>
> Very importantly also, the world championships is the the FAI worlds
> premiere event in pattern. It deserves its sole identity and
> space. I strongly recommend it has its own time and commitment. It
> is 2 years away. Now is the time to get the core group together to
> put an event together we can all be proud of. People that travel
> from all over the world to come here to compete deserve our very
> best uncompromised effort.
>
>
> It is very important we decide our philosophy in this issue. Are we
> doing this to please the casual flyer or the dedicated competitor?
> Is it a curiosity or a serious commitment to provide the very best
> arena to find the best flyer in the nation and the world?
>
>
> I say make the Nationals the best in the nation, make the World
> Championship the best in the world.
>
>
> I believe this twofer concept will make both events suffer. I am
> opposed to it.
>
>
> Separate the events by a substantial time frame. Find someone
> dedicated to making the world championship a truly world class
> event. Build a team for it. Make it happen.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike
>
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> ] On Behalf Of Anthony Frackowiak
> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 5:52 PM
> To: General pattern discussion
>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Speaking of the 2011 Worlds at
> Muncie . . . . .
>
>
>
>
> Not the same thing. The IRCHA meet is not a competition, practice
> fields are not at a premium. I still say the WC's should be held in
> September.
>
>
> Tony
>
>
> On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:
>
>
>
>
> So the IRCHA guys had their fly-in directly after the f3c world
> champs... I think it worked for them.
>
>
> Perhaps IRCHA can be persuaded to move their event out 1 week to
> accommodate us?
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Bill's Email <wemodels at cox.net> wrote:
>
> Archie Stafford wrote:
>
> I’m guessing the IRCHA guys will fight those dates as well as that
> is time they normally have their fly in, and due to the size it has
> grown to, I doubt they will be willing to give it up.
>
>
> Arch
>
>
>
> I heard they only got like 900 or so paid pilots this past year. Is
> that a lot??
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090903/67431042/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list