[NSRCA-discussion] Speaking of the 2011 Worlds at Muncie . . . . .

Derek Koopowitz derekkoopowitz at gmail.com
Wed Sep 2 15:15:46 AKDT 2009


Actually it had been all worked out until "everyone" started chiming in as
to their preference for when the wc should be held and the Nats should be
held... can't please all the people.

LOL

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Anthony Frackowiak <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net
> wrote:

> I absolutely agree. IRCHA will not move their dates unless forced to by the
> AMA. And I doubt the AMA will do so.
> I find it hard to believe that this has not been worked out yet.
>
> Tony
>
>   On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:00 PM, Bill's Email wrote:
>
>   Anthony Frackowiak wrote:
>
> Archie is absolutely correct.
> Tony
>
>  On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Archie Stafford wrote:
>
>   IRCHA is a totally different animal though.  Kind of like having Joe
> Nall after the pattern worlds.  I’d say most people really didn’t care about
> the F3C worlds.  IRCHA does a lot more 3D stuff.
>
>
>
> And my point was that attracting 900 paid participants to an event is going
> to give them some clout when it comes to a schedule relative to the pattern
> NATS. The WC are a different thing, but IRCHA is not likely to budge for the
> pattern NATS if it came to that.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090902/76f1930b/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list