[NSRCA-discussion] Fw: 2.4G ANSWER for the Nats in 2010

[Jim Quinn]

Chris,

This sounds like so me news for the next issue of the KFactor, but I guess you've already figured that our since you do such a fantastic job with the KFactor in the first place.
 Jim Quinn 




________________________________
From: krishlan fitzsimmons <homeremodeling2003 at yahoo.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Sat, October 31, 2009 12:33:46 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fw: 2.4G ANSWER for the Nats in 2010


Dave, 

Thanks for the reply here. That straightens everything out for all. 

Thanks for all you do for us!


Chris 







________________________________
From: Lance Van Nostrand <patterndude at tx.rr.com>
To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Fri, October 30, 2009 4:55:26 PM
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Fw: 2.4G ANSWER for the Nats in 2010


 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: David Guerin 
To: 'Lance Van Nostrand' 
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 10:30 AM
Subject: RE: 2.4G requirements for the Nats in 2010 or 2011?

Lance,
 
2.4 is already a requirement in all other disciplines except sailplanes, and that exception is only until they solve a technical issue with the all carbon fiber fuselages. AMA considers it a safety issue and requested that we go 2.4 at the 2010 Nats at the Planning Meeting. I petitioned the NSRCA Board and the decision was made to require 2.4 in Masters and F3A for 2010 as 90% of the pilots in 2009 were already there. It will not be required in Intermediate and Advanced until 2011. The requirement will be on the 2010 Nats entry form and I will announce it in my Nats invitation in the January K-factor.
 
I'm sure someone is unhappy, but after they think it through they will agree it makes sense and everyone’s equipment will be safer for it.
 
Regards
Dave  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091031/c1aaba5b/attachment.html>