[NSRCA-discussion] Rules proposal 11-6 question

[BUDDYonRC at aol.com]

After all of this discussion which by the way has been going on prior to  
each rules cycle for as long as I can remember, it seems to me that we all  
agree that what is important is learning to fly the airplane in every 
position  and every direction and make any and every correction necessary to safely 
 smoothly and gracefully perform a set pattern.
I can remember years back when many pilots at a contest would skip  
maneuvers that they were not proficient at.
Changing the difficulty factor is not as important as making sure that  
achievable fundamentals are included. That may mean that we have two patterns  
for each of the three lower classes, one easy teaching basics of that class 
one  year and changing to the more difficult pattern the next year to 
complete  the course. Then start over again by rotating back to basics 101 in each 
 class.
 
With the current advancement requirements is this constant increase in  
difficulty
 overwhelming and alienating the new crop of pilots instead of  projecting 
a sound basis for learning fundamental skills?
Instead of forced advancement moving to a new level should be a reward for  
becoming proficient not a punishment for having an accumulation of points 
and  ill prepared pilots moving up to a level where they do not belong.

 
Am I wrong or do I remember watching in awe at FAI pilots back in  about 
1995 doing a 45 deg. down line snap for the first time and if I remember  
correctly the FAI pattern at that time was about equal to the advanced  pattern 
of a couple of years ago before advanced was softened up and changed to  the 
current version.
Is more difficulty every rules cycle to benefit those who have been in  
masters for eons and need a change to keep the interest high?  If so that's  OK.
Could all of this constant change be a cause for the high drop out rate we  
have seen in the last few years?
Just my observations and a little food for thought.
Buddy 
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091020/506c4c0b/attachment.html>