[NSRCA-discussion] Snap

Ed Alt ed_alt at hotmail.com
Mon Oct 12 12:37:35 AKDT 2009


Same problem exists with vertical snaps at the end of the box.  It is harder to see, though not impossible.  It comes down to the pilot showing you the maneuver for maximum score.  Just as it's hard to discern precision at a great distance, for which there is a downgrade, so should not being able to see a clean break be a downgrade.  

 

Ed
 


Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:02:56 -0700
From: bob at toprudder.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Snap






If the plane is in knife-edge flight, you are mostly looking at the top or bottom of the plane. How can you observe a pitch break in that instance? If the pitch break is the complete (or biggest) tell-all of a true snap, then the maneuver schedule should be chosen to put the plane in the best position possible to observe this criteria.


--- On Mon, 10/12/09, Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com> wrote:





So, in all seriousness this time, allow me to explain what happens in the knife edge snap.  Here goes:
 
Short version: Everything works the same as a wings level snap. 
 
Longer version: The only difference is, the wing starts out completely unloaded and rapidly transitions to being loaded due to the sudden pitch change, and as it reaches the critical angle of attack, the same exact things happen.  The autorotation is due to a wing panel stalling, and it makes no fundamental difference which way the airplane is pointing when you do it.  Now, you do need to perform the correct technique with the rudder before & after to keep it flying on fuselage and propellor thrust vector lift, lest the ground rise up and smite thy model.  
 
Ed
 
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091012/1fca2b36/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list