[NSRCA-discussion] Snap

[J N Hiller]

I'm with you on this one.
Jim
 
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Don Ramsey
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 5:02 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Snap
 
Ok, how about this for the snap?  “If its not a barrel roll and not an axial roll, it’s a snap.” Maybe have the coning of the tail in the description. This eliminates about 90% of the judging differences.
 
Don
 
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Bob Richards
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 8:09 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] basic judging question (warning 4 letter word)
 
I think changing the judging criteria, just for the snap part of the manuever, would suffice.

--- On Sat, 10/10/09, John Ferrell <jferrell13 at triad.rr.com> wrote:
 
? 
I believe "We could fix most of that, by assigning a low K to snap maneuvers" is the only appropriate solution. If you cast them out, it is giving up. 
 
John Ferrell  W8CCW
 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.9/2427 - Release Date: 10/10/09 06:39:00
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091011/19d6b5b0/attachment.html>