[NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound

[Phil Spelt]

But, of course, no "flexible rules" there, at all...lol

At 10:29 AM 11/26/2009, you wrote:
>What Jon is referring to is my comment that many rule compliance
>checks will NOT be made at the Nats in 2010, but weight checks WILL
>be made of all airplanes before the Nats start as well as random spot
>checks during competition.  Checking for proper aircraft marking, the
>presence of gyros and autopilots, noise, radii of leading edges,
>noise and  proper electric-aircraft battery voltage will not be done
>for all aircraft.  It seems that the planned weight checking efforts
>will be excessive relative to the lack of verification for many rules
>which are also in the rule book.
>
>Ron
>
>On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:29 PM, Jon Lowe wrote:
>
>>Maybe RVP will volunteer; he likes checking for all kinds of silly
>>rules compliance!
>>
>>Jon Lowe
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Dave Burton <burtona at atmc.net>
>>To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>Sent: Wed, Nov 25, 2009 9:49 pm
>>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound
>>
>>
>>
>>I think that's chasing tail also. You can prop a motor toproduce
>>almost any wattage you want (within limits). Who's going tomonitor
>>what wattage is pulled after every prop change.  Are all
>>electricplanes going to be checked at every contest and throughout
>>the event? Thatsounds like a lot of fun for a CD.
>>Rule of KISS needed!
>>Dave Burton
>>
>>
>>From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org[mailto:nsrca- 
>>discussion-bounces@
>> > lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of BobRichards
>>Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 9:50 PM
>>To: General pattern discussion
>>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Well, I think the 1400 watts (or whatever wattage) is a  good start.
>>
>>  --- On Wed, 11/25/09, Phil Spelt <chuenkan at comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Hi, Dave,
>>
>>   Yes, I know that -- I have told our BOD we will be chasing our
>>tails for as  long as we permit electrics, but most of the BOD is
>>wanting to embrace the  "new technology" for power...as motors
>>improve and batteries get  stronger, things will change.  BTW, the
>>6s lipo is not part of the  current proposal -- we are trying to do
>>something different on the battery  side.  I will be glad to let
>>you know what we finally do, if you are  interested...
>>
>>  At 04:22 PM 11/25/2009, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-->There are only two types of aircraft -- fighters and targets.

Phil Spelt, Past President, Knox County Radio Control Society, Inc.
        URL: http://www.kcrctn.com
AMA--1294,  Scientific Leader Member, SPA--177
       My URL: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/~chuenkan/
       (865) 435-1476 v  (865) 604-0541 c  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091126/3fe70f90/attachment.html>