<html>
<body>
<font size=3>But, of course, no "flexible rules" there, at
all...lol<br><br>
At 10:29 AM 11/26/2009, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">What Jon is referring to is my
comment that many rule compliance <br>
checks will NOT be made at the Nats in 2010, but weight checks WILL
<br>
be made of all airplanes before the Nats start as well as random
spot <br>
checks during competition. Checking for proper aircraft marking,
the <br>
presence of gyros and autopilots, noise, radii of leading edges,
<br>
noise and proper electric-aircraft battery voltage will not be
done <br>
for all aircraft. It seems that the planned weight checking
efforts <br>
will be excessive relative to the lack of verification for many
rules <br>
which are also in the rule book.<br><br>
Ron<br><br>
On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:29 PM, Jon Lowe wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Maybe RVP will volunteer; he
likes checking for all kinds of silly <br>
rules compliance!<br><br>
Jon Lowe<br><br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Dave Burton <burtona@atmc.net><br>
To: 'General pattern discussion'
<nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br>
Sent: Wed, Nov 25, 2009 9:49 pm<br>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound<br><br>
<br><br>
I think that’s chasing tail also. You can prop a motor toproduce
<br>
almost any wattage you want (within limits). Who’s going tomonitor
<br>
what wattage is pulled after every prop change. Are all <br>
electricplanes going to be checked at every contest and throughout
<br>
the event? Thatsounds like a lot of fun for a CD.<br>
Rule of KISS needed!<br>
Dave Burton<br><br>
<br>
From:
nsrca-discussion-bounces@lists.nsrca.org[<a href="mailto:nsrca" eudora="autourl">
mailto:nsrca</a>- discussion-bounces@<br>
> lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of BobRichards<br>
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 9:50 PM<br>
To: General pattern discussion<br>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound<br><br>
<br><br>
<br><br>
Well, I think the 1400 watts (or whatever wattage) is a good
start.<br><br>
--- On Wed, 11/25/09, Phil Spelt <chuenkan@comcast.net>
wrote:<br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
Hi, Dave,<br><br>
Yes, I know that -- I have told our BOD we will be chasing
our <br>
tails for as long as we permit electrics, but most of the BOD
is <br>
wanting to embrace the "new technology" for power...as
motors <br>
improve and batteries get stronger, things will change. BTW,
the <br>
6s lipo is not part of the current proposal -- we are trying to
do <br>
something different on the battery side. I will be glad to
let <br>
you know what we finally do, if you are interested...<br><br>
At 04:22 PM 11/25/2009, you wrote:<br><br>
<br><br>
<br><br>
<br><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" eudora="autourl">
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" eudora="autourl">
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></blockquote>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>
<a href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion" eudora="autourl">
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></blockquote>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
<b><i>--></font><font face="Arial, Helvetica" size=3 color="#800000">
There are only two types of aircraft -- fighters and targets.<br><br>
</i></b></font><font size=3>Phil Spelt, Past President, Knox County Radio
Control Society, Inc.<br>
URL:
<a href="http://www.kcrctn.com/" eudora="autourl">
http://www.kcrctn.com<br>
</a>AMA--1294, Scientific Leader Member, SPA--177<br>
My URL:
<a href="http://mywebpages.comcast.net/~chuenkan/" eudora="autourl">
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/~chuenkan/<br>
</a> (865) 435-1476 v (865) 604-0541
c </font></body>
</html>