[NSRCA-discussion] Not bama now

[J N Hiller]

IMAA in past years required membership also, don't know it they still do but although I had IMAA legal airplanes I didn't participate because of the membership requirement and I'm not in favor of 'Invitational' competitions as well. 
Jim Hiller

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Jon Lowe
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 8:28 PM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Not bama now

A significant portion of the SPA airplanes look like cartoons (I feel
qualified to comment since I was a member of SPA, and flew it for
several years).  The "Daddy Rabbits" currently flying are no relation
to the real planes of the period.  If you bring out an airplane that
actually flew during that period, it is almost assured to fall afoul of
the rules, given from about 1971 on they mostly had retracts and pipes.

The other thing that has kept a lot of people out is the constant
changing of the rules, especially the unpublished ones.  The electric
situation is a case in point.  Phil admits that it could be a one year
only rule; who wants to build a plane for that?  There was also a one
time only event allowing retracts and pipes at Cullman a few years ago.
  They didn't continue that option because they didn't get many takers,
primarily because it was a one time event.

Given all of that, SPA seems to be doing ok in the southeast.  Our once
a year BPA event also does well as people like to bring airplanes out
that are really "Just like the good old days".

I'm not sure how SPA can make the events for members only in anything
but novice, as they are AMA sanctioned events.  They can make them
comply with the rules for the event, but I believe any AMA member can
participate in that sort of event without being a member of the
organization involved since it has an AMA sanction.  Just like you
don't have to be a member of IMAC or NSRCA to fly in their respective
events.

Jon Lowe

-----Original Message-----
From: scott anderson <scott at rcfoamy.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wed, Nov 25, 2009 8:31 pm
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Not bama now


The 13 inch prop is what is currently being used in the KV range of the
motors being used in either the 5S or 6S range.. we have all the data
 from the Chattanooga spa contest... And since a 16 inch prop showed up
at a contest the plane looked like a cartoon...
 
scott

----- Original Message -----

From:   Phil   Spelt

To: General pattern discussion

Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 9:27   PM

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Not bama   now



Jerry, my comments were NOT meant for you -- no   apology necessary! 

There are several pieces of miss-information   floating around in
cyberspace about our new SPA e-rules.  The attempt is   to make
electrics comparable to our glow powered planes.  The "13-inch"   rule
is not correct, and as someone pointed out, specifying cell number and 
  prop size leaves the e-power field wide open.  That is not what we
will   be doing for this year.  What we will soon have in place is for
the   upcoming season, only.  If it does not work to our satisfaction,
there is   a majority, as I read things, ready to chop off the e-head
of the e-power   sector of the hobby.  We have pretty well determined
that there were NO   electric pattern planes in our chosen era of
flying.

At 08:26 PM   11/25/2009, you wrote:

Phil,
 
I am sorry if I came across as complaining     about the rules, i meant
nothing of the sort.  I was just puzzled by     the 13" prop rule for
electric.
 
Jerry
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion     mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

--> There are only two types of aircraft -- fighters and   targets.

Phil Spelt, Past President, Knox   County Radio Control Society, Inc.
         URL: http://www.kcrctn.com
AMA--1294,  Scientific   Leader Member, SPA--177
      My URL: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/~chuenkan/
        (865) 435-1476 v  (865) 604-0541 c

------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion   mailing   list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion