[NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound

[Jon Lowe]

Maybe RVP will volunteer; he likes checking for all kinds of silly 
rules compliance!

Jon Lowe

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Burton <burtona at atmc.net>
To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wed, Nov 25, 2009 9:49 pm
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound



I think that’s chasing tail also. You can prop a motor toproduce almost 
any wattage you want (within limits). Who’s going tomonitor what 
wattage is pulled after every prop change.  Are all electricplanes 
going to be checked at every contest and throughout the event? 
Thatsounds like a lot of fun for a CD.
Rule of KISS needed!
Dave Burton
 

 From: 
nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces@
lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of BobRichards
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 9:50 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound

 



Well, I think the 1400 watts (or whatever wattage) is a  good start.

  --- On Wed, 11/25/09, Phil Spelt <chuenkan at comcast.net> wrote:

 


Hi, Dave,

   Yes, I know that -- I have told our BOD we will be chasing our tails 
for as  long as we permit electrics, but most of the BOD is wanting to 
embrace the  "new technology" for power...as motors improve and 
batteries get  stronger, things will change.  BTW, the 6s lipo is not 
part of the  current proposal -- we are trying to do something 
different on the battery  side.  I will be glad to let you know what we 
finally do, if you are  interested...

  At 04:22 PM 11/25/2009, you wrote:




 


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion