[NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound
Phil Spelt
chuenkan at comcast.net
Wed Nov 25 06:36:48 AKST 2009
Well, Guys,
I was preparing a response to Ron Van Putte, but
it appears this is not the venue for
that. Everyone is free to choose with whom to
associate, and while we in SPA are sorry to have
lost the people who have chosen not to fly with
us, that was/is their choice. If you check with
Jason Shulman, you might find a different perspective.
I won't go into the many discussions I have had
with fellow SPAers about the direction of AMA
pattern, as directed by the NSRCA -- but they are
frequent, and those of us having them choose not
to fly AMA pattern - but we don't publicly
criticize it, either. I judged several rounds at
an AMA meet last season, and while I really like
the turn around part, the judging reinforced my decision to fly SPA, only.
BTW, if anyone is interested in some 2-meter
stuff (engines and airframes) you can email me
privately...it would be great stuff @ a
reasonable price for entry into 2-meter pattern, and up through Advanced.
At 10:23 AM 11/25/2009, you wrote:
>Thats the reason I quite SPA also
>4-cycles!! There is not much challenge flying
>the old pattern with a overpowered (90 4c)
>engine. That was what made it hard! The
>scavenge-pot 60s didnt really have enough
>power, so you had to FLY the airplane
. If they
>are allowing 90 4c engines, why not allow ANY power plant!
>
>Tony Stillman, President
>Radio South, Inc.
>139 Altama Connector, Box 322
>Brunswick, GA 31525
>1-800-962-7802
>www.radiosouthrc.com
>
>----------
>From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Pete Cosky
>Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 10:20 AM
>To: jpavlick at idseng.com; General pattern discussion
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound
>
>I'm with you John. When I was into racing
>anything vintage had to be....well...vintage.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:jpavlick at idseng.com>John Pavlick
>To: <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>General pattern discussion
>Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 10:13 AM
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound
>
>Electrics in SPA? Jeez, that's kind of hard to
>stomach. Next they're going to allow electronic
>fuel-injection and anti-lock brakes in Vintage Sports Car Racing. LOL
>
>John Pavlick
>
>
>
>--- On Wed, 11/25/09, Jerry Combs
><<mailto:jcombs1947 at att.net>jcombs1947 at att.net> wrote:
>
>From: Jerry Combs <<mailto:jcombs1947 at att.net>jcombs1947 at att.net>
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Alabama Bound
>To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2009, 9:50 AM
>I don't understand the 13" prop bit either. On
>my Axi 4130-20 on 6 cells a 13" prop gives me around 500 watts.
>
>Jerry
>
>Scott, What is the reason behind a 13 inch prop limit for electric? There
>isn't any limit on prop sizes for IC engines is there? A flyer with an IC
>engine searches for the best prop size to the particular plane and engine
>combo, it seems that electric flyers should have the same flexibility.
>Dave Burton
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
><http://us.mc805.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>----------
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-->There are only two types of aircraft -- fighters and targets.
Phil Spelt, Past President, Knox County Radio Control Society, Inc.
URL: http://www.kcrctn.com
AMA--1294, Scientific Leader Member, SPA--177
My URL: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/~chuenkan/
(865) 435-1476 v (865) 604-0541 c
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091125/f17641a5/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list