[NSRCA-discussion] CA Models Eclipse

[Archie Stafford]

That airplane is typical Wingo. IMMACULATE!!!



Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 6, 2009, at 6:25 PM, Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:

> I am NOT going to lay sandpaper on this beautiful airplane.
>
> Ron
>
> On Nov 6, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Anthony Abdullah wrote:
>
>> Sand off all of the clear coat
>> That stuff weighs a ton and is no longer needed to fuel proof the  
>> airframe.
>>
>> From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
>> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Fri, November 6, 2009 12:29:33 PM
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] CA Models Eclipse
>>
>> I have two 2500 gram calibration weights.  On my electronic scale,  
>> they "weigh" 5008 grams.  The fuselage (with landing gear and  
>> wheels) is 3750 grams; the stabs (with stab tube) are 259 grams;  
>> the wings (with wing tube) are 998 grams.  That's a total of 5007  
>> grams, so it actually weighs 4999 grams.  Remember, this airplane  
>> is all painted.
>>
>> Ron
>>
>> On Nov 6, 2009, at 11:15 AM, krishlan fitzsimmons wrote:
>>
>> > Ron,
>> >
>> > You sure your scale is accurate (Heck, am I sure mine is?)? I'm  
>> putting together an Eclipse arf for a friend with a heavy Turnigy  
>> motor and heavy motor mount, a heavy Turnigy ESC, the stock wheel  
>> pants, heavy wheels, TP 5300's and it's at 4950. Most of it is put  
>> together now, all pieces weighed though.. He'll be overweight by  
>> the end of it I'm sure as he will run a heavier rec pack, Rhino  
>> 4900's, and so forth, but, he used heavier components. I know with  
>> stuff that I use he could be under with it. I built a Eclipse arc  
>> that was well under.
>> >
>> > Seeing as this plane was built for glow, I'm surprised to see how  
>> close this one is. Sorry yours is a lil heavier! Bummer as it's a  
>> nice plane!
>> >
>> > Chris
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Anthony Frackowiak <frackowiak at sbcglobal.net>
>> > To: jpavlick at idseng.com; General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
>> >
>> > Sent: Fri, November 6, 2009 8:51:53 AM
>> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] CA Models Eclipse
>> >
>> > Just a perfect example of what is wrong with the current weight  
>> rules.
>> >
>> > Tony
>> >
>> >
>> > On Nov 6, 2009, at 8:05 AM, John Pavlick wrote:
>> >
>> >> Ron,
>> >>  What are you using for an Rx battery? Regulator? Wheels? Don't  
>> overlook the little things. You only need to save 1/2 an ounce 32  
>> times. VBG
>> >>
>> >> John Pavlick
>> >>
>> >> --- On Fri, 11/6/09, Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
>> >> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] CA Models Eclipse
>> >> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca- 
>> discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> >> Date: Friday, November 6, 2009, 10:18 AM
>> >>
>> >> After further reflection, I couldn't use two 6S packs with lower  
>> capacity; it would exceed AMA's limit of 42 volts on batteries.
>> >>
>> >> Ron VP
>> >>
>> >> On Nov 6, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Ron Van Putte wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > No matter how I fudge the data, it still comes out at least a  
>> pound heavy.
>> >> >
>> >> > Ron
>> >> >
>> >> > On Nov 6, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Jerry Stebbins wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Ron, have you looked at 6s packs at lower mah. Jerry
>> >> >
>> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Thompson" <kthompson56 at satx.rr.com 
>> >
>> >> >> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
>> >
>> >> >> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 6:32 PM
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] CA Models Eclipse
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Man I wish I had the cash for that plane...
>> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Van Putte" <vanputte at cox.net 
>> >
>> >> >>> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
>> >
>> >> >>> Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 1:40 PM
>> >> >>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] CA Models Eclipse
>> >> >>>> I bought a beautiful receiver-ready CA Models Eclipse from  
>> Mike Wingo, hoping to convert it to electric power.  It is an all- 
>> painted  airplane; no MonoKote/UltraCote/etc.  It is complete,  
>> except for the receiver and is fitted with Futaba digital servos.   
>> Power is an OS  1.40RX, with appropriate header/pipe.  The only  
>> problem I have with it is that it weighs 5 kg.  After doing the  
>> math, I cannot figure out  how to convert it to electric power and  
>> keep the weight at/under 5 kg.  So, I want to sell it for what I  
>> paid for it: $900 + shipping,  if necessary, I can provide  
>> additional details/pictures for anyone who's interested.
>> >> >>>> Ron Van Putte
>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> >> >>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> >> >>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> >> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> >> >>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> >> >>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> >> >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> >> >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> >> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> >> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion