[NSRCA-discussion] Northern D5's answer to the glut in Masters

[Chris]

Why not just normalize the two groups together after the last round.  It 
would be like each round would have 2 with 1000's just like they tied 
and crunch it all together and see.  You can't use raw scores as that 
would defeat the normalizaion process and favor the line with the 
possibly "easier" judges.  In the end you have a complete Masters result 
as one class.  Perfectly fair, no but seems like a workable solution 
without the need for 2 sets of awards that you may or may not need 
depending on the turnout that day.

Chris

mike mueller wrote:
>  Yes Brian we will mix it up as the contest needs warrant. Like the beer deal. Ask Bobby I'd win that one. Mike
>
> --- On Mon, 5/18/09, brian young <brian_w_young at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> From: brian young <brian_w_young at yahoo.com>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Northern D5's answer to the glut in Masters
>> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 9:58 AM
>> I
>> think this would be fine. 
>>  
>> Instead of flipping a coin whoever can shotgun a beer
>> the fastest gets the "trophy."
>>  
>> One thing that happens when masters judge masters is
>> you lose the judge training, do you go ahead and mix in some
>> other classes as judges as well?
>>  
>> Brian
>>
>> --- On Mon, 5/18/09, mike mueller
>> <mups1953 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: mike mueller <mups1953 at yahoo.com>
>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Northern D5's answer to the
>> glut in Masters
>> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 8:55 AM
>>
>>
>>
>> After a discussion at our Pattern seminar here on Saturday
>> we have come up with what we think is a workable solution to
>> this problem.
>> First we will wait to see how the classes form on the
>> morning of our contests. If we have bad numbers in that the
>> Masters class dominates the ranks we will then split the
>> class into 2 groups by picking the names out of a hat. Group
>> A will judge Group B. This remains the situation throughout
>> the contest. Since this doesn't give the contests
>> organizers a chance to have 2 sets of awards the trophys
>> will be awarded by a flip of a coin. So say they announce
>> the winners of 3rd place both guys come up and flip the
>> coin. Ideally the awards are not trophy's but paper in
>> which case the award problem is solved.
>> As far as District points we just add up the numbers for
>> each group seperatly.
>> Does anyone see a problem with this? Thanks, Mike Mueller
>>
>>
>>      
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>       
>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>     
>
>
>       
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090518/06a578dc/attachment.html>