[NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence

mike mueller mups1953 at yahoo.com
Wed May 6 07:55:28 AKDT 2009


 Chris it's way too early in the morning for Bobby to say "Have a nice day" That comes later in the day. Man don't you know anything about Bobby yet??? Mike


--- On Wed, 5/6/09, Chris Moon <cjm767driver at hotmail.com> wrote:

> From: Chris Moon <cjm767driver at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: Wednesday, May 6, 2009, 10:19 AM
> <div id=yiv1991765604><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC
> "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
> <html>
> <head>
>   
> </head>
>  
> Bobby you left out "Have a nice day"<br>
> <br>
> Chris<br>
> <br>
> Robert G. Satalino wrote:
> <blockquote
>  type="cite">No FAI hand me downs. Just take
> out three maneuvers,
> that's more time for other things.
>   <div><br>
>   </div>
>   <div>  <br>
>   <div> <span class="Apple-style-span"
>  style="border-collapse:separate;color:rgb(0, 0,
> 0);font-family:Helvetica;font-size:20px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;orphans:2;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;widows:2;word-spacing:0px;">
>   <div style="">
>   <div>Robert Satalino</div>
>   <div><a rel="nofollow"
> target="_blank"
> href="mailto:rcairbob1 at comcast.net">rcairbob1 at comcast.net</a></div>
>   <div><br>
>   </div>
>   </div>
>   </span><br
> class="Apple-interchange-newline">
>   </div>
>   <br>
>   <div>
>   <div>On May 5, 2009, at 11:23 AM, mike mueller
> wrote:</div>
>   <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
>   <blockquote type="cite">
>     <div><br>
> Mark we have plans for splitting Masters into 2 groups
> around here.
> Anything else is a disaster. Mike<br>
>     <br>
>     <br>
> --- On Tue, 5/5/09, Atwood, Mark <<a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:atwoodm at paragon-inc.com">atwoodm at paragon-inc.com</a>>
> wrote:<br>
>     <br>
>     <blockquote type="cite">From: Atwood,
> Mark <<a rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:atwoodm at paragon-inc.com">atwoodm at paragon-inc.com</a>><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">Subject: RE:
> [NSRCA-discussion] Length of
> 2011 Masters Sequence<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">To:
> "General pattern discussion" <<a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org</a>>,
> "<a rel="nofollow"
> target="_blank"
> href="mailto:mups1953 at yahoo.com">mups1953 at yahoo.com</a>"
> <<a rel="nofollow"
> target="_blank"
> href="mailto:mups1953 at yahoo.com">mups1953 at yahoo.com</a>><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">Date: Tuesday,
> May 5, 2009, 10:57 AM<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">Hear
> Hear!!<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">I love flying
> long sequences...hate judging
> them.  There<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">needs to be a
> balance.  Not just for the
> sake of the judges,<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">but also to
> accommodate the length of the
> contest.  <br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">At a big D4/D5
> contest we'll usually have
> 5-6 FAI<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">pilots and 15
> or 16 masters pilots.
>  Currently the masters<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">pattern is a
> MINIMUM of 10 minutes per
> pilot (maybe not in<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">the air, but
> you have to really have people
> on their toes to<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">even get 6
> flights in an hour).  With 16
> masters pilots,<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">that's 2
> hours and 40 minutes of flying per
> round if<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">you're
> humpin'.   Six rounds means 16 hours
> of<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">flying for JUST
> masters guys.  Assuming you
> have 2 lines,<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">that means one
> of those lines is dedicated
> to Masters for<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">the entire
> contest AND assume you have 16
> hours to fly.<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">We never have
> 16 hours to fly.  Rarely can
> we get people to<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">stay until 6pm
> on Sunday (9am - 6pm with a
> lunch break both<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">days) and most
> fields have the sun in the
> box either in the<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">morning or
> afternoon which shortens the
> flying day even<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">more.<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">Now add to
> those woes that you only have
> 5-6 FAI guys<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">judging.
>  You need 32 man hours of judging,
> so even if you<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">mix in a group
> of Advanced flyers it's a
> loooong time in<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">the
> chair.<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">Bottom line,
> regardless of whether it's
> P-09 (probably<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">not a good
> choice at this point) or a home
> brewed<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">pattern...it
> needs to follow the FAI trend
> of getting a<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">little shorter.
>  <br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">My
> .02<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">-----Original
> Message-----<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">From: <a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">[<a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org</a>]
> On Behalf<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">Of Archie
> Stafford<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">Sent: Tuesday,
> May 05, 2009 11:38 AM<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">To: <a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:mups1953 at yahoo.com">mups1953 at yahoo.com</a>;
> 'General
> pattern<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote
> type="cite">discussion'<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">Subject: Re:
> [NSRCA-discussion] Length of
> 2011 Masters<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote
> type="cite">Sequence<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote
> type="cite">Verne,<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">This started
> when I suggested to the
> sequence committee<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">that we need
> to<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">shorten the
> masters pattern.  Flying it is
> fine, but I<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">think we need
> to take<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">into account
> the guys who have to sit and
> judge it.  I<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">heard several
> guys in<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">FAI judging
> this weekend about how long a
> sequence it is. <br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">Which
> wouldn't be<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">near as bad
> except for the fact Masters is
> usually the<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">largest class
> at most<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">contests.
>  I think we need to consider the
> length of time<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">in the
> judges<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">chair for those
> that have to judge it as
> well.<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">Arch<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">-----Original
> Message-----<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">From: <a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">[<a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org">mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org</a>]
> On Behalf<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">Of mike
> mueller<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">Sent: Tuesday,
> May 05, 2009 10:31 AM<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">To: General
> pattern discussion<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">Subject: Re:
> [NSRCA-discussion] Length of
> 2011 Masters<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote
> type="cite">Sequence<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"> The current
> pattern puts E. guys at a bit
> of a<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">disadvantage.
> It pushes my<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">setup a little
> further than I prefer. It is
> a great pattern<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">and I
> compliment<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">the designers
> for having a nice flow. Mike<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">--- On Tue,
> 5/5/09, <a rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:verne at twmi.rr.com">verne at twmi.rr.com</a><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><<a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:verne at twmi.rr.com">verne at twmi.rr.com</a>>
> wrote:<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">From: <a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:verne at twmi.rr.com">verne at twmi.rr.com</a>
> <<a rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:verne at twmi.rr.com">verne at twmi.rr.com</a>><br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">Subject: Re:
> [NSRCA-discussion] Length of
> 2011 Masters<br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote
> type="cite">Sequence<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">To:
> "General pattern discussion"<br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><<a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org">nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org</a>><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">Date:
> Tuesday, May 5, 2009, 10:24 AM<br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">If it sounded
> as though I were
> complaining that the<br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote
> type="cite">current<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">Masters
> schedule takes too long, I
> wasn't. Just<br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">commenting
> that it takes a lot longer
> than the<br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">previous
> one.<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">For me, eight
> minutes from takeoff to
> landing approach<br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">(my<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">timer is
> started on takeoff and is almost
> always<br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote
> type="cite">beeping<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">during my
> landing). I fly at what I would
> call a<br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote
> type="cite">medium<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">speed most of
> the time. <br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">I'm also
> against flying the FAI-P
> schedule.<br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote
> type="cite">I'd<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">rather fly a
> home-grown variant that we
> create<br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote
> type="cite">ourselves.<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">Verne
> Koester<br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">---- Stuart
> Chale <<a rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:schale at optonline.net">schale at optonline.net</a>>
> wrote: <br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">
>         <blockquote
> type="cite">_______________________________________________<br>
>         </blockquote>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">
>         <blockquote
> type="cite">NSRCA-discussion mailing
> list<br>
>         </blockquote>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">
>         <blockquote type="cite"><a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
>         </blockquote>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite">
>         <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>         </blockquote>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote
> type="cite">_______________________________________________<br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote
> type="cite">NSRCA-discussion mailing
> list<br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite"><a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">
>       <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>       </blockquote>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote
> type="cite">_______________________________________________<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote
> type="cite">NSRCA-discussion mailing
> list<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote
> type="cite">_______________________________________________<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote
> type="cite">NSRCA-discussion mailing
> list<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><a
> rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite"><br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">No virus found
> in this incoming message.<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">Checked by AVG
> - <a rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="http://www.avg.com">www.avg.com</a>
> <br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">Version:
> 8.5.285 / Virus Database:
> 270.12.17/2095 - Release<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <blockquote type="cite">Date: 05/04/09
> 06:00:00<br>
>     </blockquote>
>     <br>
>     <br>
>     <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>
>     <a rel="nofollow"
>  target="_blank"
> href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org</a><br>
> <a rel="nofollow"
> class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
> target="_blank"
> href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a><br>
>     </div>
>   </blockquote>
>   </div>
>   <br>
>   </div>
>   <pre>
> <hr size="4" width="90%">
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> <a rel="nofollow"
> class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
> target="_blank"
> href="mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org">NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org</a>
> <a rel="nofollow"
> class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
> target="_blank"
> href="http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion">http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion</a></pre>
>   <pre>
> <hr size="4" width="90%">
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - <a rel="nofollow"
> class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
> target="_blank"
> href="http://www.avg.com">www.avg.com</a>
> 
> Version: 8.5.287 / Virus Database: 270.12.19/2099 - Release
> Date: 05/05/09 13:07:00
> 
>   </pre>
> </blockquote>
>  
> </html>
> 
> 
> </div>_______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


      


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list