[NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence

Brian brian_w_young at yahoo.com
Tue May 5 10:35:30 AKDT 2009


Im using about the same power as last year, i would geuss a bit less if anything.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Lachowski <jlachow at hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 11:46 AM
To: NSRCA Discussion List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence

Mike,
 
Interesting you mentioned putting E-guys which I am at a disadvantage. My flights to date typically utilize between 3200ma and 3700ma out of a 5000ma setup. I reached a hair over 4000ma once and that was with 20 plus mph winds and a not completely optimized throttle curve. I typically fly the sequence and land. On a calm day I might squeek in two extra maneuvers. On windy days I just got to remember to eliminate the procedure turn on takeoff which is so ingrained in my head after all these years. Procedure turn, now there is where some time is wasted<g>

 
> Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 08:31:13 -0700
> From: mups1953 at yahoo.com
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence
> 
> 
> The current pattern puts E. guys at a bit of a disadvantage. It pushes my setup a little further than I prefer. It is a great pattern and I compliment the designers for having a nice flow. Mike
> 
> 
> --- On Tue, 5/5/09, verne at twmi.rr.com <verne at twmi.rr.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: verne at twmi.rr.com <verne at twmi.rr.com>
> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence
> > To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> > Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2009, 10:24 AM
> > If it sounded as though I were complaining that the current
> > Masters schedule takes too long, I wasn't. Just
> > commenting that it takes a lot longer than the previous one.
> > For me, eight minutes from takeoff to landing approach (my
> > timer is started on takeoff and is almost always beeping
> > during my landing). I fly at what I would call a medium
> > speed most of the time. 
> > 
> > I'm also against flying the FAI-P schedule. I'd
> > rather fly a home-grown variant that we create ourselves.
> > 
> > Verne Koester
> > 
> > 
> > ---- Stuart Chale <schale at optonline.net> wrote: 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > >
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. See how.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090505/15be8966/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list