<HTML><head><style>
hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style></head><body class="hmmessage"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-WEIGHT:Normal;">Im using about the same power as last year, i would geuss a bit less if anything.</span><br><br><hr><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma; font-weight:bold">From: </span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma; font-weight:normal;">Joe Lachowski <jlachow@hotmail.com></span><br><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma; font-weight:bold">Sent: </span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma; font-weight:normal;">Tuesday, May 05, 2009 11:46 AM</span><br><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma; font-weight:bold">To: </span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma; font-weight:normal;">NSRCA Discussion List <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org></span><br><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma; font-weight:bold">Subject: </span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma; font-weight:normal;">Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence</span><br><br>Mike,<br> <br>Interesting you mentioned putting E-guys which I am at a disadvantage. My flights to date typically utilize between 3200ma and 3700ma out of a 5000ma setup. I reached a hair over 4000ma once and that was with 20 plus mph winds and a not completely optimized throttle curve. I typically fly the sequence and land. On a calm day I might squeek in two extra maneuvers. On windy days I just got to remember to eliminate the procedure turn on takeoff which is so ingrained in my head after all these years. Procedure turn, now there is where some time is wasted<g><br><br> <br>> Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 08:31:13 -0700<br>> From: mups1953@yahoo.com<br>> To: nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence<br>> <br>> <br>> The current pattern puts E. guys at a bit of a disadvantage. It pushes my setup a little further than I prefer. It is a great pattern and I compliment the designers for having a nice flow. Mike<br>> <br>> <br>> --- On Tue, 5/5/09, verne@twmi.rr.com <verne@twmi.rr.com> wrote:<br>> <br>> > From: verne@twmi.rr.com <verne@twmi.rr.com><br>> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence<br>> > To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org><br>> > Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2009, 10:24 AM<br>> > If it sounded as though I were complaining that the current<br>> > Masters schedule takes too long, I wasn't. Just<br>> > commenting that it takes a lot longer than the previous one.<br>> > For me, eight minutes from takeoff to landing approach (my<br>> > timer is started on takeoff and is almost always beeping<br>> > during my landing). I fly at what I would call a medium<br>> > speed most of the time. <br>> > <br>> > I'm also against flying the FAI-P schedule. I'd<br>> > rather fly a home-grown variant that we create ourselves.<br>> > <br>> > Verne Koester<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > ---- Stuart Chale <schale@optonline.net> wrote: <br>> > > _______________________________________________<br>> > > NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>> > > NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrcaorg<br>> > ><br>> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>> > NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list<br>> NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org<br>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<br><br><hr>Insert movie times and more without leaving HotmailŪ. <a href="http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009" target="_new">See how.</a></body></HTML>