[NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence

[Brian]

My tendancy is to want to adopt the FAI but make some revisions that keep it in the realm of possibilities for all current pilots flying masters as well as the current  planes. There is some stuff in the FAI that would cause a loss in participation if masters adopts it absolutly.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 8:27 AM
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence


I'm with you on this one . . .  There might have been a time when the Masters and FAI schedules were interchangeable, but not anymore. For me personally it is the rolling circles or loops that would knock me out. I have enough trouble making straight rolls look good. 

 Bob Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com



----- Original Message ----
From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2009 10:15:53 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence

Let me post a dissenting input.  If the Master class pilots were "plenty good enough" to fly the FAI P maneuver schedule, we'd be in FAI.  I have no desire to fly the FAI P or any other FAI sequence that is selected by anyone else but pilots in the U.S.  The Master class is the U.S. destination class.  Leave FAI and its maneuver schedules to those who want to compete on the international level.

Rant over.

Ron

On May 5, 2009, at 9:02 AM, michael s harrison wrote:

> Joe,
> 
> It has probably been mentioned before but I would recommend simply using the existing-whatever is at that time- FAI P pattern for the masters sequence and allow it to be replaced by the upcoming P pattern every cycle.  The pilots are plenty good enough and it would really simplify things and put everyone on the same page.  I believe it would be exciting and fun.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Joe Lachowski
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 8:05 AM
> To: NSRCA Discussion List
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Length of 2011 Masters Sequence
> 
> 
> 
> There has been some discussion on whether it is time to shorten the length of the Masters sequence for 2011. A Poll has been set up on RCU to get the current crop of Masters pilots and future Masters pilots opinions.
> 
> http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_8742141/tm.htm
> 
> Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



      
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion