[NSRCA-discussion] USA CIAM Representative?
Earl Haury
ejhaury at comcast.net
Tue Mar 31 03:58:38 AKDT 2009
Rusty
I agree with Ron, selecting the US CIAM Fxx Technical Subcommittee reps is
the responsibility of the AMA. Their process has not been obvious in years
past, but understand that there are very few qualified folks who are willing
to serve. Also there is no term limit attached to the job, so the selection
of a new rep occurs infrequently. This is actually a good thing in that the
rules cycles cover four years and it takes time to develop respect /
relationships so as to be effective in the committee. I've been involved
with F3A competition since 1979 and am only aware of Ron Chidgey and Chris
Lakin holding the F3A job (Steve Helms was appointed interim rep to replace
Ron until Chris accepted the job). I find it refreshing that the AMA sought
recommendations from the NSRCA for a successor to Chris.
It is an important job and US members have contributed immensely to what
pattern is today through participation and innovation as members / leaders
of the F3A subcommittees and the CIAM. Check
http://www.fai.org/aeromodelling/ then "Official" to view the folks
currently involved. Unfortunately, there is no requirement that our reps
report back to the US pattern community directly - nor have they been
required to seek advice regarding the community's wishes. As we've enjoyed
very qualified, experienced, respected (by the world pattern community)
reps, their actions have been in the best interest (IMHO) of pattern and the
US pattern community. The lack of a reporting has let to misunderstanding of
the influence and results provided by the US reps.
The AMA's action of seeking input from the NSRCA for recommendations for the
job speaks of the respect that the AMA has for the current NSRCA. The action
of the NSRCA in taking the imitative to obtain and host the 2011 WC likely
enhanced this respect. While the NSRCA has no "control" over the F3A rep, we
certainly provide an opportunity for Derek to keep us apprised of
subcommittee workings via the K-Factor and website / list. I look forward to
the timely transfer of info and activities and I'm sure Derek will consider
feedback as well.
Maybe the NSRCA should develop a formal process for selecting the best
candidate for the F3A rep job. This was the first time that we were ask to
participate. The board members from each district sought candidates and
solicited resumes. They voted for their preference. I'm proud to have been
considered and consider it a job well done.
Earl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Van Putte" <vanputte at cox.net>
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] USA CIAM Representative?
> Rather than have any NSRCA representative attempt to describe what AMA's
> CIAM representative selection process is, my suggestion is that you
> contact AMA through your district VP or AVPs and ask them what their
> process is.
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
> On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:03 PM, Ali Dose wrote:
>
>> Mr. Van Putte,
>>
>> I appreciate your response and "clearing up" the NSRCA's ability to
>> "recommend" an individual to the AMA. Does the AMA accept input from
>> others as well?
>>
>> Is it reasonable to assume that there exists some kind of process,
>> albeit rather informal, that the AMA communicates to the appropriate
>> special interest group board (NSRCA in this case) seeking/asking/has an
>> interest in/give us a few names of... e
>> individuals who have the qualifications to be the single most important
>> individual representing the USA precision aerobatic collective? If they
>> do, could the NSRCA Board "share" this with the members?
>>
>> Even if one were to "diminish" the precision aerobatic's collective
>> interest in the position as not that interesting...and assuming that the
>> leader's of the special interest group recognized the fantastic
>> opportunity to communicate the position, articulate the potential the
>> candidate could provide to the precision aerobatic collective, create
>> enthusiasm and support/cooperation to get stuff done in the future...The
>> position could be posted on this thread (I am a big moron it it was
>> posted here) in the K-Factor (I am a bigger moron if it was posted
>> there)?
>>
>> Once again, Derek is a fine individual.
>>
>> I am requesting the "behind the scenes" process, to insure that in the
>> future, every candidate who is qualified, experienced, passionate about
>> radio control precision aerobatics has the same opportunity to learn,
>> prepare for and be apart of the USA CIAM representative selection
>> process.
>>
>> "...Done Deal..." is not a specific enough answer for me.
>>
>> This thread may not be the most appropriate venue to discuss and may be
>> reached at my office (312) 580-6838, or this e-mail.
>>
>> Rusty Dose
>> Thrilled for Derek
>> Thrilled for the 2011 World Champs in Muncie
>> Dedicated to all the fine modelers "not always included"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Van Putte" <vanputte at cox.net>
>> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:51 PM
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] USA CIAM Representative?
>>
>>
>>> Well, the first thing we need to get cleared up is that the position
>>> of CIAM representative is an AMA position. NSRCA does not have
>>> anything more than the ability to recommend an individual. Ryan Smith
>>> explained what went on there, so I won't repeat what he wrote. AMA
>>> accepted the recommendation of Derek as the CIAM representative. Done
>>> deal.
>>>
>>> Ron Van Putte
>>>
>>> On Mar 26, 2009, at 8:35 PM, Ali Dose wrote:
>>>
>>>> I learned yesterday that "we" have a new CIAM representative, Derek
>>>> Koopowitz, who has replaced Chris Lakin. Apparently, congratulations
>>>> to Derek.
>>>>
>>>> How is the individual selected?
>>>> Who is on the nominating Committee?
>>>> Is there such a committee?
>>>> How are the candidates views and opinions communicated?
>>>> Who votes?
>>>> Is the NSRCA, as the AMA's FAI F3A special interest group,
>>>> responsible for the process and then an AMA official, after careful
>>>> consideration and review "rubber stamps" the submission?
>>>> Did I need to have a FAI stamp to participate?
>>>> Am I the last to know?
>>>>
>>>> Derek is a fine choice AND there are also a bunch of others who, I
>>>> hope, were considered and reviewed...
>>>>
>>>> who have made significant contributions to the sport on the local,
>>>> regional and national levels, have significant leadership experience,
>>>> have attended numerous FAI F3A World Championships as a Team member
>>>> or Manager or Team volunteer, have been involved at the highest
>>>> levels and ample amounts of time to focus on the role without
>>>> distration or other responsibilities...
>>>>
>>>> who also would make excellent contributions and continue the
>>>> traditions of excellence of our current and past CIAM representatives.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Respectfully,
>>>>
>>>> Rusty Dose
>>>> Past NSRCA Treasurer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list