[NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
Ed Alt
ed_alt at hotmail.com
Thu Mar 19 14:51:48 AKDT 2009
Stu:
This battery technology will run cooler and deliver more usable power to the motor. As long as the weight and reliability is good, it is a good thing.
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: Stuart Chale
To: General pattern discussion
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
The key in my mind as we already have enough power in a makable weight for a new set of batteries, is the number of cycles you can get. It the new technology gets us 200 cycles before degradation then I'll take 2 :) Don't need three any more because they charge faster.
Stuart
Ed Alt wrote:
This is very straightforward. The ideal battery is one that has 0 ohms internal resistance and infinite current delivery capability. This new technology gets you somewhat closer to that ideal. All it means is that it minimizes power losses due to much lower internal resistance, and reduces limitations that are placed on the performance of the thing you are powering with it. Even the ideal battery can only deliver as much current into the load as that device will draw based on its own resistance (actually impedance, but we'll keep it simple) Doesn't matter whether it is a motor, a light bulb or whatever. It's all good...
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: Keith Hoard
To: General pattern discussion
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
How good would these batteries work in my glow starter?. . .
2009/3/19 Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com>
No way! That is simply evidence that your paint needs to be upgraded!
----- Original Message -----
From: Rex
To: NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
Now I'm just guessing here.... I'm thinking that if you throttle up and the paint
strips off the fuse, that's probably a bit too much!
Rex
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: joddino at socal.rr.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:10:06 -0700
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Fwd: New fast charge battery
I used to say that an engine is a machine that doesn't make enough power. Now I say a motor is also a machine that doesn't make enough power.
Jim
On Mar 19, 2009, at 8:29 AM, J N Hiller wrote:
Hay Rex how much power do you need? You can do a vertical ROG now.
Jim
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--
Keith Hoard
Collierville, TN
khoard at gmail.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090319/0339f017/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list