[NSRCA-discussion] Weight

[James Oddino]

Then a logical person would say let's lower all the numbers.  Weight  
is the enemy so if people want to add weight let them.  I say let it  
go to 5.5 Kilos and we can quit talking about it.

Jim O


On Jun 3, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Dave wrote:

> <96 db, <2M, <11 lbs, and it is legal.  Your challenge is to meet  
> those
> specs with whatever equipment you choose.
>
> Raise any of those limits, and the cost and complexity of pattern  
> goes up.
> If you think what pattern needs is more cost and complexity, submit  
> the
> proposal.  And as Duane notes, the new breed of monoplanes will  
> obsolete
> your DA-50 Bipe.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of J N  
> Hiller
> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 1:46 PM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight
>
> I was thinking pattern legal DA-50.
> Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Duane  
> Beck
> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 10:06 AM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight
>
> http://www.mini-iac.com/
> DA-50's and larger biplanes very common.  Have at it.  :-)
>
> Duane
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "J N Hiller" <jnhiller at earthlink.net>
> To: jpavlick at idseng.com, "General pattern discussion"
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 12:12:21 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Weight
>
>
> Interesting discussion. I always felt the weight limit replaced the
> displacement limit prevent the use of very large engines.
>
> Remove it now and we will see DA-50 or larger biplanes. I have  
> wanted to
> build one for a long time.
>
> Bring it on.
>
> Jim Hiller
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion