[NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?

[krishlan fitzsimmons]

This is really funny. They want to bring the nats to 2 weeks to cut costs. I am sure they make money the way it is. Take this for what it is, heresay, but  I heard that the members of the club were complaining that the nats takes too much of their time away from their field for them to fly. Wasn't the field built for a localized nats site? And I'm pretty sure we all paid for it. The ama will lose out if they go to a 2 weeks nats IMO. Wait till they see entry's decline. 

Chris          

--- On Thu, 7/30/09, Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com> wrote:

From: Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
To: "'General pattern discussion'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 12:55 PM




 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 







That is a possibility also.  AMA is
thinking about returning the NATS to a 2 week all-events NATS like used to be
done.  If all events are together, HQ can put all costs into one effort.  If
they are all split up, Each group would have more costs to deal with due to the
fact that HQ can’t send a group of people to every site. 

   

Tony Stillman, President 

Radio South, Inc. 

139 Altama Connector,
 Box 322 

Brunswick,
 GA   31525 

1-800-962-7802 

www.radiosouthrc.com 







From:
nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Tim Taylor

Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:39
PM

To: General
 pattern discussion

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010? 

   


 
  
  
  It was done, It was called NPAC 
  
  
    
  
  
  Tim

  

  --- On Thu, 7/30/09, Bill's Email <wemodels at cox.net>
  wrote: 
  
  
  

  From: Bill's Email <wemodels at cox.net>

  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?

  To: " General pattern discussion "
  <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

  Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 2:06 PM 
  
  Why not allow the SIGS to do their own thing? IMAC
  and NSRCA do not need to share a site. The LSF can find a site for the
  soaring NATS. Pylon knows what venues work for them and so on. FF can do
  their own thing as well. Why tie soaring and FF together and so on??

  

  

  Tony wrote:  
  
  Matt:

  Yes, it is just difficult to tell if it is actually feasible…  The
  problem is that it requires a large site for Pattern/Pylon/IMAC and will
  require another large site for Soaring/Outdoor FF.  It may be very
  difficult to actually find places that can handle this group. 
  
    
    
  
  
  Tony Stillman, President 
  
  Radio South, Inc. 
  
  139 Altama Connector, Box 
   322 
  
Brunswick, GA  
 31525 
    1-800-962-7802  
  www.radiosouthrc.com 
  
  
  
  
  
     
  

  -----Inline Attachment Follows----- 
  
  _______________________________________________

  NSRCA-discussion mailing list

  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
  
  
 


   



 


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090731/32b7af31/attachment.html>