[NSRCA-discussion] Hacker C50 15XL?

[Archie Stafford]

Ken

I saw this plane fly most of last week. Flew really well.

Arch

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 19, 2009, at 9:19 PM, krishlan fitzsimmons <homeremodeling2003 at yahoo.com 
 > wrote:

> I will be selling my Abbra if interested soon with a little chin  
> cowl (very minor) damage. It will be pretty cheap. I just have to  
> finish my Emotion first.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Sun, 7/19/09, Ken Thompson <KTHOMPSON56 at satx.rr.com> wrote:
>
> From: Ken Thompson <KTHOMPSON56 at satx.rr.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Hacker C50 15XL?
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: Sunday, July 19, 2009, 11:58 AM
>
> Speaking of all of this...I'm currently looking for another...very  
> inexpensive...e-airframe for the rest of the season...if I can't  
> work something out I'll go back to my Mantis and us that for the  
> rest of the season...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Keith Black
> To: General pattern discussion
> Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 1:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Hacker C50 15XL?
>
> The Matts flew the 15XL on the Beryll and frankly I could never  
> understand how they could use it as my 14XL was on the slow side  
> with my Brio. Now I have a Beryll and can understand how it could be  
> usable with a 15XL as the Beryll is extremely clean and will very  
> easily pick up speed.
>
> I'm flying a 14XL with my Beryll and think it's fine, but it would  
> be interesting to try the 15XL to see what the Matts liked about it.
>
> Clearly the Beryll was designed low drag with electric in mind. Most  
> other modern pattern planes need a 14XL or even a little more pull  
> such as 13XL or the Neu F3A motor (which I think is somewhere  
> between the 14XL and the 13XL.
>
> Keith Black
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Anthony Abdullah  
> <aabdu at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> I am looking into getting an electric motor for my new Integral and  
> saw that Hacker has a C50 15XL that is labeled "new and improved".  
> Does anyone have any experience with this motor? Is it in any way  
> suitable or superior to the more popular C50 13 and C50 14s that  
> people have been using.
>
> I searched RCU but found very little info on the motor.
>
> Thank you
> Anthony
> NSRCA #759
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090720/09438fe4/attachment.html>