[NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business

Gray E Fowler gfowler at raytheon.com
Fri Jan 16 08:03:28 AKST 2009


John

We can easily make sure there is enough mounting suface area. Please 
define your opinion of "enough". I am thinking 1 inch wide by 2 inches per 
side or so.

Twist can be reduced. Current designs do not address twist issues at all. 
Anytime there is nothing but unidirectional zero degree fibers twist will 
occur.



Gray Fowler
Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
Radomes and Specialty Apertures
Technical Staff Composites Engineering
Raytheon



"John Pavlick" <jpavlick at idseng.com> 
Sent by: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
01/15/2009 11:26 PM
Please respond to
General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>


To
"General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
cc

Subject
Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business






Gray,
 Good ideas. Some thoughts:
Yes, splitting them isn't so much the problem. Two-piece gear is plenty 
strong but there does need to be a reasonable amount of surface area 
there. Some of the Bolly gear gives you very little to work with.
 
Some designs still need the swept gear so that may complicate things.
 
The twisting is annoying. If there is a way to reduce that while still 
providing some flex to absorb the shock of landing then that would be 
great.
 
While we're on the subject of landing gear - what is the best mounting 
bolt pattern? I've seen quite a few different arrangements.What works and 
what doesn't?
 
 
John Pavlick
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Gray E Fowler 
To: General pattern discussion 
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business


Anthony 

What did you think about the ES gear twist? That is the wheel going toe 
in- toe out hitting small bumps. ES had nothing but zero degree fibers. 
That is the one design issue I am conteplating at the moment. 

Also considering that all new planes are widebody that is what needs to be 
addressed..BUT having a 1 continuous gear will be more weight. I am 
thinking it is better to split the gear for a weight savings.  If we make 
two pieces, and either piece can be a left or a right, then a broken gear 
is only on one side. Any advantage to that?




Gray Fowler
Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
Radomes and Specialty Apertures
Technical Staff Composites Engineering
Raytheon 


Anthony Romano <anthonyr105 at hotmail.com> 
Sent by: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
01/15/2009 04:18 PM 

Please respond to
General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>



To
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
cc

Subject
Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business








Graph Tech is not for us. I am sure their stuff is well suited for the 
IMAC style planes that they are designed for but too heavy and way too 
stiff for our use. 
I went through their website and picked a gear based on dimension of the 
ES. 2+ ounces heavier and twice as thick with zero flex. Broke the gear 
out of my Black Magic many times when hitting small holes in the runway. 
Rick donated his ES gear and life has been much better. 

Anthony



From: jlachow at hotmail.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:59:26 -0500
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business

Anyone have any luck with the Graph Tech RC stuff?  Only experience was 
with some smaller electrics that worked just fine. They have carbon pants 
and spinners, as well.


From: tony at radiosouthrc.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:00:23 -0500
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business


Thanks, Jim.  Those are $112.00 I think… about double that of the Bolly…. 
Not sure how that will go….. but if there are no other choices… 
  
  
Tony Stillman, President 
Radio South, Inc. 
139 Altama Connector, Box 322 
Brunswick, GA  31525 
1-800-962-7802 
www.radiosouthrc.com 


From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Woodward, 
Jim (US SSA)
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:52 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business 
  
Tony, 
  
Luiz at Net Box Hobby carrys the CA carbon gear. 
  
Thanks, 
Jim 
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Tony
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:36 PM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business 
  
I just received conformation that BOLLY has gone out of business. 
Unfortunately, this is a major supplier of CF landing gear and wheel 
pants.  I have been awaiting a shipment of several items, and now it does 
not look like that will happen.  I am working now to determine if there 
are any gear/wheel pants available.   
  
The really bad thing is that I am not sure what options we have left, 
other than going with a kit/arf manufacturer’s gear.  Ed Skorpa dropped 
his gear last year… 
  
  
  
Tony Stillman, President 
Radio South, Inc. 
139 Altama Connector, Box 322 
Brunswick, GA  31525 
1-800-962-7802 
www.radiosouthrc.com 
  

Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Chat. Store. Share. Do more with mail. See how it 
works.
Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Chat. Store. Share. Do more with mail. See how it 
works._______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 



_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090116/b9d9c82c/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list