[NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business

John Pavlick jpavlick at idseng.com
Thu Jan 15 20:33:52 AKST 2009


Yeah, that's what I was saying. That gear setup is GOOD ENGINEERING. Light, effective and dependable. Not a "brute force" (i.e. heavy) arrangement.

John Pavlick
http://www.idseng.com
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ed Alt 
  To: General pattern discussion 
  Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 8:18 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business


  IMO, the CF landing to emulate is what Wistmodel makes.  Try to top them for light weight, strength, flexibility and ability to absorb shock and not tear your airplane apart.  They look great too. Bolly's are nice, but don't hold a candle to what Wistmodel produces for the Prestige.

  Ed
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Gray E Fowler 
    To: General pattern discussion 
    Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 5:56 PM
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business



    Anthony 

    What did you think about the ES gear twist? That is the wheel going toe in- toe out hitting small bumps. ES had nothing but zero degree fibers. That is the one design issue I am conteplating at the moment. 

    Also considering that all new planes are widebody that is what needs to be addressed..BUT having a 1 continuous gear will be more weight. I am thinking it is better to split the gear for a weight savings.  If we make two pieces, and either piece can be a left or a right, then a broken gear is only on one side. Any advantage to that?




    Gray Fowler
    Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
    Radomes and Specialty Apertures
    Technical Staff Composites Engineering
    Raytheon 


          Anthony Romano <anthonyr105 at hotmail.com> 
          Sent by: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
          01/15/2009 04:18 PM Please respond to
                General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 


         To <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  
                cc  
                Subject Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business 

                

         



    Graph Tech is not for us. I am sure their stuff is well suited for the IMAC style planes that they are designed for but too heavy and way too stiff for our use. 
    I went through their website and picked a gear based on dimension of the ES. 2+ ounces heavier and twice as thick with zero flex. Broke the gear out of my Black Magic many times when hitting small holes in the runway. Rick donated his ES gear and life has been much better. 

    Anthony



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: jlachow at hotmail.com
    To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:59:26 -0500
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business

    Anyone have any luck with the Graph Tech RC stuff?  Only experience was with some smaller electrics that worked just fine. They have carbon pants and spinners, as well.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: tony at radiosouthrc.com
    To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:00:23 -0500
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business


    Thanks, Jim.  Those are $112.00 I think… about double that of the Bolly…. Not sure how that will go….. but if there are no other choices… 
      
      
    Tony Stillman, President 
    Radio South, Inc. 
    139 Altama Connector, Box 322 
    Brunswick, GA  31525 
    1-800-962-7802 
    www.radiosouthrc.com 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Woodward, Jim (US SSA)
    Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:52 PM
    To: General pattern discussion
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business 
      
    Tony, 
      
    Luiz at Net Box Hobby carrys the CA carbon gear. 
      
    Thanks, 
    Jim 
    From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Tony
    Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:36 PM
    To: 'General pattern discussion'
    Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] BOLLY out of business 
      
    I just received conformation that BOLLY has gone out of business.  Unfortunately, this is a major supplier of CF landing gear and wheel pants.  I have been awaiting a shipment of several items, and now it does not look like that will happen.  I am working now to determine if there are any gear/wheel pants available.   
      
    The really bad thing is that I am not sure what options we have left, other than going with a kit/arf manufacturer’s gear.  Ed Skorpa dropped his gear last year… 
      
      
      
    Tony Stillman, President 
    Radio South, Inc. 
    139 Altama Connector, Box 322 
    Brunswick, GA  31525 
    1-800-962-7802 
    www.radiosouthrc.com 
      




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Chat. Store. Share. Do more with mail. See how it works.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Chat. Store. Share. Do more with mail. See how it works._______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 





----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090116/f193372e/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list