[NSRCA-discussion] 8611 on rudder
Dave Harmon
k6xyz at sbcglobal.net
Thu Jan 8 23:28:27 AKST 2009
I started using an 8611A after I noticed that the 8411A would go into
oscillation because of the tension on the PP wires.
Supposedly, the center dead band was set too tight for a rudder application
and I believe it was Troy that pointed out the 8611A was the way to go for
this application.
Apparently it has a slightly wider dead band that fixes this problem...more
power too.
Thanks Troy...
I haven't had any more problems..well, with the rudder anyways..
Regards
Dave Harmon
NSRCA 586
K6XYZ[at]sbcglobal[dot]net
Sperry, Ok.
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 1:45 AM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] 8611 on rudder
I'm interested in feedback from those who are using the 8611 or 8611A on a
2M rudder. Is that extra torque as compared to an 8411 class servo really
buying you anything? I'm always reluctant to go to a metal gear servo,
although the 8611 is pretty low on slop as MG servos go.
Thanks
Ed
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090109/4b9458e0/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list