[NSRCA-discussion] Inspection & Weighing

[John Gayer]

Why is this rule necessary rather than make it at the discretion of the 
CD? If F3A is not an AMA class and there is no mandatory advancement, 
why not allow flying in both? Attendance is low enough at many local 
contests that the extra entry fee would be appreciated by the sponsoring 
club and the extra competition by the competitors in the two classes.

John Gayer


Bill's Email wrote:
> J Shu wrote:
>> I'll fly my 50 sized glow plane... its a different plane lol
>>
>
> Like I said, if the pattern rules allow it, why not??  However, they 
> appear not to do so:
>
> 8.2.5: There is no mandatory advancement into FAI from the Masters 
> class. Contestants may enter their current AMA class or the FAI class 
> at any contest but not both.
>
>
>
>
> And pattern does not differentiate classes based on aircraft type as 
> soaring does. Maybe it should. Perhaps we need a 50-sized glow powered 
> plane class. And then 0.90, 1.10, and 1.70 glow class, and an electric 
> class. Then maybe break that up into biplanes and monoplanes while we 
> are at it.  Then get over 300 planes at an event irrespective of the 
> number of individual pilots and there you go!! 9 days or more for 
> pattern!!
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090804/9603e926/attachment.html>