[NSRCA-discussion] Inspection & Weighing

[krishlan fitzsimmons]

Yeah but that's just a rule. They don't matter, right? haha

Chris          

--- On Tue, 8/4/09, Bill's Email <wemodels at cox.net> wrote:

From: Bill's Email <wemodels at cox.net>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Inspection & Weighing
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 10:11 AM




  
J Shu wrote:

  
  
  I'll fly my 50 sized glow
plane... its a different plane lol
  

  



Like I said, if the pattern rules allow it, why not??  However, they
appear not to do so:



8.2.5: There is no mandatory advancement into FAI from the Masters
class. Contestants may enter their current AMA class or the FAI class
at any contest but not both.









And pattern does not differentiate classes based on aircraft type as
soaring does. Maybe it should. Perhaps we need a 50-sized glow powered
plane class. And then 0.90, 1.10, and 1.70 glow class, and an electric
class. Then maybe break that up into biplanes and monoplanes while we
are at it.  Then get over 300 planes at an event irrespective of the
number of individual pilots and there you go!! 9 days or more for
pattern!!







 

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090804/7c77d410/attachment.html>