[NSRCA-discussion] Inspection & Weighing

[krishlan fitzsimmons]

This may be fine Matt, but aren't rules rules? 
When you allow one to be broken, the next guy that breaks a different rule can point the finger and say "well you let that person break that rule" and so on. 



Chris          

--- On Tue, 8/4/09, rcmaster199 at aol.com <rcmaster199 at aol.com> wrote:

From: rcmaster199 at aol.com <rcmaster199 at aol.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Inspection & Weighing
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 8:33 AM


If someone wants/needs to "cheat" with an overweight plane, I have no problem letting them. 


 


If someone wants/needs to "cheat" with preprogrammed sequencing or a larger airframe than 2 X 2 m, a different story


 


MattK










-----Original Message-----

From: Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com>

To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

Sent: Tue, Aug 4, 2009 9:50 am

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Inspection & Weighing






 
#yiv613210685 #AOLMsgPart_3_9ae5f3a0-a5b0-4046-b74a-8c614ebbcf50 DIV {margin:0px;}


I agree, trying to compare ourselves to any other AMA NATS event is a slippery slope. Let's clean our own house and not worry about anybody else.



Since I fall squarely in the "social" NATS category I would certainly volunteer to tech inspect aircraft prior to any official flying. I'm not going to gain much by getting a few last practice fllights in.



As for the possibility of cheating, well, we can only do so much.  A quick check to insure the batteries installed at measurement time are capable of a full flight for whatever class the pilot has entered.  I can't imagine saving much weight with a smaller tank for nitro planes, but same thing goes.





 
Bob Kane

getterflash at yahoo.com












From: Bill's Email <wemodels at cox.net>

To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2009 9:32:09 AM

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Inspection & Weighing



Joe Lachowski wrote: 

#yiv613210685 #AOLMsgPart_3_9ae5f3a0-a5b0-4046-b74a-8c614ebbcf50 .hmmessage P{margin:0px;padding:0px;}#yiv613210685 #AOLMsgPart_3_9ae5f3a0-a5b0-4046-b74a-8c614ebbcf50 body.hmmessage{font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}




 

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090804/21c935e8/attachment.html>