[NSRCA-discussion] Inspection & Weighing

[rcmaster199 at aol.com]

If someone wants/needs to "cheat" with an overweight plane, I have no problem letting them. 


?


If someone wants/needs to "cheat" with preprogrammed sequencing or a larger airframe than 2 X 2 m, a different story


?


MattK










-----Original Message-----

From: Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com>

To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

Sent: Tue, Aug 4, 2009 9:50 am

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Inspection & Weighing










I agree, trying to compare ourselves to any other AMA NATS event is a slippery slope. Let's clean our own house and not worry about anybody else.



Since I fall squarely in the "social" NATS category I would certainly volunteer to tech inspect aircraft prior to any official flying. I'm not going to gain much by getting a few last practice fllights in.



As for the possibility of cheating, well, we can only do so much.? A quick check to insure the batteries installed at measurement time are capable of a full flight for whatever class the pilot has entered.? I can't imagine saving much weight with a smaller tank for nitro planes, but same thing goes.





?
Bob Kane

getterflash at yahoo.com












From: Bill's Email <wemodels at cox.net>

To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2009 9:32:09 AM

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Inspection & Weighing



Joe Lachowski wrote: 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090804/bbb9d96a/attachment.html>