[NSRCA-discussion] Masters Avalanche question
Gene Maurice
gene.maurice at sgmservice.com
Mon Apr 6 19:13:40 AKDT 2009
Statistically ya gotta 50 - 50 chance of using the correct rudder............
So why in God's name, sure as He made little green apples, I'll move that stick the wrong way 90% of the time.
Gene Maurice
gene.maurice at comcast.net
Plano, Texas
AMA 3408 NSRCA 877
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jon Lowe
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 8:59 PM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters Avalanche question
Hey Chuck, you can't say ANYTHING anymore without offending someone.
One radio commentator calls us the "United States of the Offended".
BTW, I cheat as much as possible when I fly. I also seem to get caught
a lot, especially when my "cheat" makes things worse. After all, wrong
rudder is the most powerful force in the universe, isn't it?!
Jon Lowe
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Hochhalter <cahochhalter at yahoo.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 8:05 pm
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters Avalanche question
I apologize if anyone took offense to my cheating comment. My entire
flight is a cheat to avoid zeros. It was meant to be humorous. Every
correction made is a "cheat" we hope is not noticed so we receive the
highest score possible.
Chuck Hochhalter
--------------------------------------------------
From: "billglaze" <billglaze at bellsouth.net>
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 4:55 PM
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters Avalanche question
> AHA! So, that was you!! Bill Glaze
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Burton" <burtona at atmc.net>
> To: <patternrules at yahoo.com>; "'General pattern discussion'"
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 20
09 5:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters Avalanche question
>
>
>> At a contest last week end I failed to do a half roll at the bottom
of
>> the
>> triangle. I realized what I had done after pulling to the up line
and
>> skillfully did a full roll to get back in inverted position for the
>> figure
>> 9. Both judges zeroed the triangle for missing the first half roll
but
>> neither caught the full roll to get back inverted until I told them
after
>> the flight.
>> Dave Burton
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
Steven
>> Maxwell
>> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 4:23 PM
>> To: General pattern discussion
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters Avalanche question
>>
>>
>> Actually I did a wrong maneuver at a contest the district
championships I
>> only seen my scores after they had been put in the computer I told
the CD
>> that it should have been a zero and the next 2 maneuver also should
have
>> been zero, till I corrected my position.
>> Steve Maxwell
>>
>>
>> --- On Mon, 4/6/09, Dennis Cone <patternpilot at verizon.net> wrote:C2
>>
>>> From: Dennis Cone <patternpilot at verizon.net>
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters Avalanche question
>>> To: "'General pattern discussion'"
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 3:27 PM
>>> I once was at a contest flying Masters in which I found
>>> myself right side up
>>> when I should have been inverted. We were flying into the
>>> sun so I pulled
>>> vertical right into the suns path, did the required
>>> maneuver and when I
>>> reached the sun I rolled and pushed out of the maneuver. I
>>> was then in the
>>> right position for the next maneuver. A round later I was
>>> calling for Frank
>>> Capone and he did the same thing. So I whispered to him to
>>> pull into the sun
>>> and roll right when he could not see it. Neither one of us
>>> got caught. Was
>>> it cheating? Perhaps, but I like to call it creative
>>> flying. It was not
>>> planned, so really not cheating. I'm sure everyone has
>>> done a maneuver
>>> incorrectly and was not caught by the judges. Did you tell
>>> them to zero it?
>>> Probably not.
>>>
>>> Dennis
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at li
sts.nsrca.org
>>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf
>>> Of Ron Van Putte
>>> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 6:13 AM
>>> To: General pattern discussion
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters Avalanche question
>>>
>>> It's only cheating if you get caught.
>>>
>>> Ron
>>>
>>> On Apr 5, 2009, at 9:54 PM, Chuck Hochhalter wrote:
>>>
>>> > Ron, that is cheating, you should immediately point
>>> out to the
>>> > judges that you lead the snap in order to preserve the
>>> geometry of
>>> > the maneuver.
>>> >
>>> > --------------------------------------------------
>>> > From: "Ronald Van Putte"
>>> <vanputte at cox.net>
>>> > Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 7:34 PM
>>> > To: "General pattern discussion"
>>> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters Avalanche
>>> question
>>> >
>>> >> What you can try is easing some yaw in by putting
>>> in a bit of
>>> >> left rudder just before entering the snap (the
>>> judges probably
>>> >> won't even notice).
>>> >>
>>> >> Ron
>>> >>
>>> >> On Apr 5, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Keith Black wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> I'm having trouble with the Masters
>>> Avalanche and wanted to see
>>> >>> if anyone had any suggestions or was
>>> experiencing the same problem.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Entering the maneuver left to right then
>>> pushing the half loop
>>> >>> to the snap, If I attempt a positive snap to
>>> the right (which
>>> >>> rotates the plane away from the flight line)
>>> the nose comes
>>> >>> around nicely to complete the arch of the
>>> loop, but ends
>>> >>> pointing about 20 degrees away from the
>>> flight line. If I stay
>>> >>> on the rudder after the snap I can
>>> immediately put the plane
>>> >>> back in line, but it's quite ugly and
>>> obvious rather than
>>> >>> smoothly exiting the snap parallel to the
>>> flight line. I've
>>> >>> tried using less rudder, but have not been
>>> able to get that to
>>> >>> work any better.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I've also tried an outside snap but to me
>>> this looks terrible
>>> >>> and the nose is elevated on exit.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The plane is a Beryll.
=0
A
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Keith Black
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> >>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> >>>
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> >>
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> >
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list