[NSRCA-discussion] JR 10X conversion to LiPo
vicenterc at comcast.net
vicenterc at comcast.net
Tue Sep 23 14:26:57 AKDT 2008
Troy,
Well, that is clear like water. Thanks for the feedback. I was checking alternates since I need to replace the TX batteries for next season. I will keep using the NiMh as you recommended.
--
Vicente "Vince" Bortone
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Troy Newman" <troy at troynewman.net>
> Vince,
>
> While its not recommended there are several people that have done it. I
> will say that because you will hear of XXX people that have done it with
> no problems.
>
> JR does NOT recommend it and here is why: The output of the system is
> driven by a specific design voltage. In the 72mhz stuff the output
> transistor would get hot if the system was run at the higher voltage. A
> 3S lipo pack comes off the charger at about 12.4-12.6V....A fully
> charged stock battery pack comes off the charger at about 11.5 to 12V.
> Here is what I think you should look at. The Lipo pack will maintain is
> "over voltage" condition for a long time. It will stay above 11.5V most
> of the time you spend flying it. Where as the Nimh or Nicd packs will
> fall off to about a 10.5V range and slowly come down from there. The
> high voltage condition is only for a few minutes maybe the first flight.
> The lipo high Voltage condition is a long time maybe 5-8 flights.
>
> The issue with the 72mhz equipment was the output transistor would get
> hot and start to weaken causing loss of range and possible a failure.
> This is the same problem as running your TX on 72mhz and leaving it on
> for long periods of time with the antenna down. The module gets hot.
> This is un-needed wear and tear on the output transistor. Continued
> abuse like this will weaken the output transistor...In the lipo you are
> running it in a "high" volt condition for a longer period of time every
> time you charge the system up. So yes it will work on day #1 and Day
> #2....but What happens on Day #50 or 9 months down the road. 1 yr later?
> Its not a good idea as it will weaken the system and it could cost you a
> model.
>
> Fast forward to the DSM technology. Again we have a similar situation.
> The output of the system was designed to be run at a given voltage. That
> voltage is the 8cell (nicd or Nimh) packs. Not the extra 1V of head
> voltage carried in the 3S lipo packs. I'm not in on the design of the
> DSM output and can't tell you if it has a similar issue to the one in
> the 72mhz. However in the 12X manual it states clearly....
>
> "Q: Can I use a 3-cell LiPo pack in my transmitter?
>
> A: No. All current JR and Spektrum transmitters are designed to operate
> using a 9.6-volt transmitter pack. A fully charged 3-cell LiPo pack puts
> out 12.6 volts. This higher voltage can overload the power-regulating
> transistor, causing damage and or failure, possibly in flight. Many of
> our customers have experienced failures using 3-cell LiPo packs and
> their use in JR and Spektrum transmitters is highly advised against. The
> 12X system will operate for over 8 hours using the included 2000mAh NiMH
> battery."
>
>
>
> This being the case the 12X is the latest system from JR. SO if it is
> not Lipo capable the others are not either. Will it work? Yes, are you
> taking a chance and risking your model YES.
>
> I don't understand the rave with the lipo TX packs. The 12X pack that
> comes standard is a 2000mah pack. A replacement pack would be a
> 2000-2100mah pack also... So you are not going to get more flight time
> per charge. The only thing is the lipo will not self discharge as fast
> as the Nimh. However I find the Nimh packs last for a very long
> time....Still flyable (10.5V) after sitting for a month untouched. One
> note I usually charge my TX packs with the wall C/10 charger overnight.
> I sometimes will use a Sirius charger on them or a peak detection
> charger for a quick field boost if its getting low. However This is a
> rare thing. 90% of my charging is with the slow c/10 charge rate. At
> this the Nimh packs provide extremely good service life and hold their
> charge well. A guy that is always fast charging his nimh batts will have
> trouble with the Nimh technology. It doesn't do as well with this type
> of use.
>
>
> By the way JR makes a 2500mah nimh that I have placed in my 9303 and
> also have installed in an old 10X battery case. It works great as well.
>
>
>
> Hope this helps you.
>
> Troy Newman
> Team JR
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
> vicenterc at comcast.net
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 3:35 AM
> To: General pattern discussion; General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] JR 10X conversion to LiPo
>
>
> Jerry,
>
> Are you using regulator? It looks like JR does not like the high
> voltage. Probably, I am going to try to call or e-mail JR to ask. I
> wonder if there is a difference between the 2.4 modules and the old
> modules in regard taking higher voltage. New TX are designed to work
> with LiPo. Just wondering.
>
> JR sponsored pilits. Can you find out?
>
> Thanks for all responding.
>
> --
> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>
>
> -------------- Original message --------------
> From: Budd Engineering
>
> > Yep, and I couldn't be happier.
> >
> > True R/C 2500 mAh LiPo's, $30 each, fits inside the 10X
> battery holder
> > with a minor amount of trimming with the Dremel tool. I bought
> one
> > set to try, liked it so well I bought another and converted
> the spare
> > battery pack. That way I can charge them out of the
> transmitter (not
> > that it matters, the charge rate is so low that the risk of a
> mishap
> > is about the same as with NiCads or NiMh).
> >
> > I screwed around with a couple sets of NiMH's for the past
> several
> > years, they were a total waste of time, the self discharge
> rate got to
> > where I had to re-charge them if I didn't fly within a day or
> so of
> > the previous charge
> >
> > The LiPo 's pea k up at 12.5 V, essentially the same voltage
> as a good
> > set of NiCads, and discharge almost linearly, so it's easy to
> assess
> > their state of discharge.
> >
> > http://home.comcast.net/~truerc/ready_pack/ready_packs.htm
> >
> > Thx, Jerry
> >
> > Budd Engineering
> > jerry at buddengineering.com
> > http://www.buddengineering.com
> >
> > On Sep 22, 2008, at 8:56 AM, vicenterc at comcast.net wrote:
> >
> > > Has anyone done the conversion?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Vicente "Vince" Bortone
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> & gt; http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080923/bf0d2435/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list