[NSRCA-discussion] Biplanes

[shinden1 at cox.net]

now your starting something,, 
that airplane would be right up Nat`s ally,
I can  already see two dorsal fins hanging on that thing :-)
Now" that" would be a Knife edging Machine.
Bryan


---- JShulman <jshulman at cfl.rr.com> wrote: 
> I want another Hot Canary... my grandfather had 2 big one's (maybe small at the time, but they were huge to us little kids) and they
> were the coolest looking bipes I'd ever seen at the time. They cut up pretty good too. Who's got that new Hot Canary bipe started
> for pattern????
> 
> Regards,
> Jason
> www.jasonshulman.com
> www.shulmanaviation.com
> www.composite-arf.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of seefo at san.rr.com
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 6:15 PM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Biplanes
> 
> 
> Hot Canary was actually a scale-ish model based upon the Hot Canary biplane racer.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---- Charles Hochhalter <cahochhalter at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > So.. removing the need to look down to land... would a reverse stagger bipe be unthinkable for pattern needs?
> >
> >   I remember the Hot Canary... wing sat on the top of the fuse and the spacing was minimal.
> >
> >   Chuck
> >
> > shinden1 at cox.net wrote:
> >   Hey Ron thanks,
> > Remember back in the 70`s there was a very cool model called the "HOT CANARY" it was a hot dog airplane made for aerobatics , and
> fun flys
> > with the lower wing forward a reall handfull to fly
> > may-be we can revive it for pattern
> > Bryan
> >
> >
> > ---- Ron Van Putte wrote:
> > > Since the top wing affects the bottom wing more than the other way
> > > around and, based on the way downwash works, the top wing affects the
> > > bottom wing even more when the top wing is in front of the bottom
> > > wing. So,you'd think all biplanes would have the top wing behind the
> > > bottom wing, like in the Staggerwing Beech. However, pilots have a
> > > peculiar desire to look down on either side of the fuselage and it's
> > > a lot easier for them if the top wing is forward of the bottom wing.
> > >
> > > Ron VP
> > >
> > > On May 30, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Charles Hochhalter wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > What is the aerodynamic advantage to putting the top wing forward
> > > > on a biplane as opposed to the Beech Saggerwing design?
> > > >
> > > > Just curious... looking for some good discussion.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chuck
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > > > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > > > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.4/1474 - Release Date: 5/30/2008 7:44 AM
> 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.4/1474 - Release Date: 5/30/2008 7:44 AM
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion