[NSRCA-discussion] triangulation trimming

vicenterc at comcast.net vicenterc at comcast.net
Tue Mar 18 17:01:18 AKDT 2008


Chris,

Very good information.  How much right thrust?  I think you are correct,  move the CG a little more forward.  It could  help the snaps also.

--
Vicente "Vince" Bortone

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: krishlan fitzsimmons <homeremodeling2003 at yahoo.com>
> Ok Bryan, 
>    
>   Here's how I went out today and man was I suprised, 0 degree down thrust, 0 
> stab, 3/4 positive in the wing.. Cg forward where Budd recommends. What a 
> difference.. I had a neutral elevator for the first time since I owned the plane 
> without adjusting things.. Uplines were good, downlines pulled to the canopy 
> still. Horizontal lines, the plane DID feel more locked into the line.. It's 
> never felt like that.. Mixing, well it still needed about 15% up mix in knifes, 
> down from 30% though. Inverted nearly hands off. 45 roll to inverted slowly 
> drops the nose. 45 downs are locked in. Snaps, well they suck for some reason. w
> Not from this, but when I did cg, and other changes before, I changed throws cuz 
> the snaps sucked.  It took alot more down ele, and aileron for inverted snaps..  
> And still, when I start the snap, it breaks, then slowly gets into the snap, 
> then speeds up too fast causing an overrotation. Regular snaps are now too fast 
> (easy to cure though with a different dual rate
>  setting). 
>   I think my cg could go forward to help with the up ele needed in knife, and 
> also the pull to canopy on downlines maybe?? Or should I play with the wing 
> adjusters more?
>    
>   Thanks, 
>    
>   Chris
>    
>   
> Nat Penton <natpenton at centurytel.net> wrote:
>       Wayne
>   You missed the seminar - that was the rest room <G>.
>     ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Wayne Galligan 
>   To: NSRCA Mailing List 
>   Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:21 AM
>   Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] triangulation trimming
>   
> 
>   John Crapper was not the original inventor of the toilet.  However Thomas 
> Crapper was one of the people that was responsible for it popularity.  Not to 
> sure where John L Crapper came from but  the original inventor was John 
> Harington.  So maybe that's how the "John" and the "Crapper" have been come to 
> be known as.
>     ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Wayne Galligan 
>   To: NSRCA Mailing List 
>   Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:11 AM
>   Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] triangulation trimming
>   
> 
>   Water Closet (WC) is a toilet that disposes of the waste by using water to 
> flush it through a drainpipe to another location. Modern toilets incorporate an 
> 'S' bend; this 'trap' creates a water seal which remains filled the 'S' bend 
> also provides siphon action which helps accelerate the flushing process. Water 
> filling up the bowl creates a high pressure area which forces the water past the 
> S bend. At the S bend when water starts to move it creates a vacuum that pulls 
> the water and waste out of the toilet. When no more water is left then the air 
> stops the siphon or vacuum process. At that point the water that is going into 
> the bowl continues to fill up the bowl to equalize the bowl and the S bend. This 
> ends the cycle of one flush.  Since there were no rooms designated for toilets 
> or crappers as they were called (named after John L Crapper, inventor of the 
> flush toilet) the term Water Closet was coined as homes that had the out houses 
> moved indoors were usually located in
>  closets in the home.
>    
>   Flush away............
>     ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Karl G. Mueller 
>   To: NSRCA Mailing List 
>   Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:45 AM
>   Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] triangulation trimming
>   
> 
>   Vicente,
>    
>   "WC" actually is the short form of "Water Closet".
>   That's what the early Toilets were called.
>    
>   Karl G. Mueller
> kgamueller at rogers.com
> 
>     ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: vicenterc at comcast.net 
>   To: adriancwong at earthlink.net ; NSRCA Mailing List 
>   Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 10:04 PM
>   Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] triangulation trimming
>   
> 
>   WC = toilet. I wonder how many went and check.  
>    
>   --
> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>    
>   -------------- Original message -------------- 
> From: adriancwong at earthlink.net 
>   BODY {   FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 
> Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff  }      
> body{font-family: 
> Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: 
> black;}  "WC", huh? I haven't heard that word since I've moved back from Hong 
> Kong in the early 90's. 
> 
> May be I should try the knife edge on a vertical down line, instead of doing it 
> horizontally? 
> 
> 
>   -----Original Message----- 
> From: vicenterc at comcast.net 
> Sent: Mar 17, 2008 7:00 PM 
> To: adriancwong at earthlink.net, NSRCA Mailing List 
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] triangulation trimming 
> 
>   That is called Coriolis accerelation.  That is why the water closets flush to 
> the right in the North hemisphere and to the left in the South hemisphere 
> (looking the water closet from above).  If going down straight you are close to 
> the ecuator.  If this do not happens as described the water closet needs to be 
> trimmed. 
>    
>   --
> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>    
>   -------------- Original message -------------- 
> From: adriancwong at earthlink.net 
> I think Bryan is hiding in his wind tunnel trying to duplicate the same 
> condition.
> 
> I don't think it was my digits. It's probably between the earth's gravitational 
> pull and soething in the northern hemisphere. I bet the plane will do the exact 
> opposite if I fly it in Australia ... .-)
> 
> 
>   -----Original Message----- 
> From: Derek Koopowitz 
> Sent: Mar 17, 2008 3:36 PM 
> To: NSRCA Mailing List 
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] triangulation trimming 
> 
>   I think he wishes it was his thumbs... :)
>    
>   The push to the belly was more than the pull to the canopy... the pull was 
> very slight.
> 
> 
>   On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:24 PM, krishlan fitzsimmons 
> <homeremodeling2003 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>     I was going to tell Adrian his thumbs cause this.. 
>   Just kidding of course Adrian..
>    
>   C   
> 
> Nat Penton <natpenton at centurytel.net> wrote:
> 
>     Where is Bryan when you need him 
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: 
> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" 
> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 10:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] triangulation trimming
> 
> 
> > Bryan,
> >
> > What cause the plane to pull to the belly on one rudder, and to the canopy 
> > on the other rudder during knife edge.
> >
> > Thx,
> >
> > Adrian
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >>From: shinden1 at cox.net
> >>Sent: Mar 16, 2008 7:17 PM
> >>To: NSRCA Mailing List 
> 
>   >>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] triangulation trimming
> >>
> >>Lance you need to find out exactly where the wing inc . is.
> >>I think if you move your c/g back a little it will help take some of the 
> >>up trim out But you prob need more pos inc, in the wing so we need to know 
> >>where you are at right now to determine exactly where to go
> >>Bryan
> 
>      
>   >>---- Lance Van Nostrand wrote:
> >>> Bryan,
> >>>
> >>> The discussion list moves faster than I can try this stuff out. Too bad 
> >>> I
> >>> have to work...
> >>>
> >>> I first only moved my CG forward significantly and have improved overall
> >>> tracking. It was windy Saturday and wind penetration were good. 
> >>> Bryan's
> >>> suggestion was correct on CG movement to make this improvement. However
> >>> with the forward CG (and resultant uptrim) it pulls to the canopy 
> >>> slightly
> >>> on downlines. At this point I noticed that during inverted flight, 
> >>> rudder
> >>> input caused a pull to the belly (plane rose). This was weird. I then
> >>> raised the incidence 2 turns and it fixed the inverted flight problem 
> >>> but it
> >>> seemed to make the canopy pul! l worse . Interestingly, KE flight was not
> >>> noticeably affected.
> >>>
> >>> The other affect is that inverted 45 downlines drop toward earth faster 
> >>> than
> >>> upright 45s (which track nicely). Before this change, both 45s were 
> >>> fine.
> >>>
> >>> Is this the expectation?
> >>>
> >>> --Lance
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >>NSRCA-disc! ussion@ l ists.nsrca.org
> >>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   Chris 
>    
>      
>    
>   
>   
> ---------------------------------
>   Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.   
>   
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
>     
> ---------------------------------
>     
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>     
> ---------------------------------
>     
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>     
> ---------------------------------
>     
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>     
> ---------------------------------
>     
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
> Chris 
>    
>    
>    
> 
>        
> ---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: krishlan fitzsimmons <homeremodeling2003 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] triangulation trimming
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:24:07 +0000
Size: 27711
Url: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080319/8b3b1b4b/attachment-0003.mht 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list