[NSRCA-discussion] voltage regulator

[John Pavlick]

Nice. Well, if you contact Tech Aero you will get a reply from one of the guys who designed, assembled, tested, calibrated and actually use these regulators in their Pattern planes. Probably the same applies to the Jaccio. :) I know I don't have to speak about the quality of Castle Creation's Products.
   
  Not bashing the MPI stuff but their business model doesn't lend itself to "personalized technical support". 
   
  John Pavlick
  
John Konneker <jlkonn at hotmail.com> wrote:
      .hmmessage P  {  margin:0px;  padding:0px  }  body.hmmessage  {  FONT-SIZE: 10pt;  FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma  }    Claude,
A reason I would be reluctant about running a MPI product is an experience I had with their CH-818 charger.
Just before Toledo I bought one and checked it out with my VOM.  They claim it drops to trickle charge after
it delta peaks.  Mine did not.  I talked to them at Toledo where they told me I didn't wait long enough between normal 
charge and trickle.  When I got home I tried it again.  This time I let it sit overnight.  Guess what?  It not only does not
drop in to trickle but it actually discharges slightly.  We exchanged emails back and forth in which they said they knew nothing 
about it.  That their chip supplier had switched specs on them and that they would change their website to reflect the 
charger's current performance.
I just checked.  Two months after this exchange they are still advertising it as a peak/trickle charger.
Guess some folks will get a surprise, huh?
JLK

> From: cweimer at tconl.com
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:05:38 -0500
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] voltage regulator
> 
> Is there an opinion about Mpi Regulators from Maxx Products? I have a couple
> of them that I have never used. Regulators make me a little nervous because
> it is another thing in the system that could go bad.
> 
> Claude
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Dwayne Brown
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:50 AM
> To: 'General pattern discussion'
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] voltage regulator
> 
> Jaccio regulators have always worked well for me and I like to support Mr.
> Oddino. Dwayne
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Troy Newman
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:53 PM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] voltage regulator
> 
> Any of the above will work fine.
> 
> I personally like the 5.1V regs from Jaccio. But either radio system
> will not care on any of the 3 choices you have there. Some of the Futaba
> servos are rated as 4.8V only so this may affect your decision. But if
> you choose JR servos they can run unregulated 5cell packs just fine. SO
> any of the voltage choices are good on JR servos.
> 
> 
> Troy Newman
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jerry
> Wilson
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:26 PM
> To: 'General pattern discussion'
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] voltage regulator
> 
> Which voltage regulator (Jaccio) should be used with a 5 cell 6 volt
> receiver pack? There are three sizes: 5.1, 5.7, and 6.0 volt
> 
> Thanks,
> Jerry
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG. 
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release Date: 6/10/2008
> 7:22 AM
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080611/106b9b13/attachment.html>