[NSRCA-discussion] Transmitter Tray

[John Pavlick]

Serious design flaw! I see your point. I bet they could be customized to "fit" though. Whoa, now that could be fun! <LOL>
   
  John Pavlick

"Linda A. Carnes" <patternlady at tds.net> wrote:
        v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}  o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}  w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}  .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}                Those are nice but do not work for girls.
   
      
---------------------------------
  
  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jay Marshall
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 3:24 PM
To: rudyl11 at yahoo.com; 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Transmitter Tray

   
  Try this. I love it! http://retracts.com/radioTray.htm
   
    Jay Marshall 

  -----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Leonard Rudy
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 1:36 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Transmitter Tray
   
            Does anyone know where to get a transmitter tray that is metal with shoulder straps

    and side boards where you can rest your hands while controlling the transmitter sticks?

--- On Wed, 7/30/08, Verne Koester <verne at twmi.rr.com> wrote:

    From: Verne Koester <verne at twmi.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] battery question
To: mileHiPilot at gmail.com, "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 9:03 PM
      Hi Mike,

    The FlitePower F3A 5350 packs are two, 5-cell packs that are matched to each other. I know that FlitePower makes a big deal about keeping each 5-cell pack with its mate. I've kept track by numbering the packs and keeping the number 1 pair together, the number 2 pair together, and so on. I've been using them since the start of this season with good power and consistency. My understanding is that the matching results in a pair of packs that balance well to each other resulting in less work for the balancer, particularly when charged in series as a 10S pack. That's been my experience so far with about 40 cycles on each pair of packs. I have 4 pairs. Three of those were purchased at the start of the season. The fourth set was used by a friend briefly last year and found its way into my "fuel box". All four pairs consistently put out the same power. Hope this helps.

     

    Verne Koester

     

     

      ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Michael Ramsey 

    To: 'General pattern discussion' 

    Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 9:23 AM

    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] battery question

     

    A related question: Is it true that the cells are "matched" in a pack? If so, what advantage would that have?

     

    Thanks, Michael Ramsey

    -----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Stuart Chale
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 9:14 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] battery question
  Yes :)


If a cell puffs it is easier to replace in a 5 cell pack.  Also cheaper to replace a 5 cell pack if a cell goes pre-maturely and you do not like to replace cells.  You might find use for a 5 cell pack by itself.  Smaller plane, Heli etc.  The downside is that you have to add a little weight for a Y connector to connect both packs.  
A 10S pack is a "little" easier to secure in the plane.  I will probably only buy 5 cell packs from now on.  Currently trying out the True-RC packs.

Stuart

Anthony Romano wrote: 
  Other than cooling is there any down side to a 10s brick as apposed to two 5s packs?
    
---------------------------------
  
  Stay in touch when you're away with Windows Live Messenger. IM anytime you're online. 

 

  

    
---------------------------------
    

 

  

 

_______________________________________________

NSRCA-discussion mailing list

NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

  
      
---------------------------------
  
  _______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


_______________________________________________

NSRCA-discussion mailing list

NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

   

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080731/e7668b47/attachment-0001.html>