[NSRCA-discussion] [Bulk] Re: Kline pump
Karl G. Mueller
kgamueller at rogers.com
Sat Jul 5 15:37:55 AKDT 2008
Del,
One thing I like to point out is that the "Kline" is not a pump
the same as the Perry.
It is a "Demand Regulator" that works on the negative pressure
from the carburetor. The "Kline" needs a pressurized tank to work,
while the "Perry" does not need the pressure and will work with an
open vent line to the tank. It does not need a closed fuelling setup
while the "Kline" does.
Karl G. Mueller
kgamueller at rogers.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Del
To: General pattern discussion
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 4:52 PM
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Kline pump
After talking to the people I bought my Kline pump from they told me to
bend the metal valve slightly to adjust the pressure and it worked perfect
for me. So if you are not getting the pressure you want give them a call and
they will talk you through it.
Del
----- Original Message -----
From: george w. kennie
To: jpavlick at idseng.com ; General pattern discussion
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Venus Engine Question
I once installed a Kline in my Focus which had a 150 2 Stroke in it and
the pressure generated by that particular engine was too high, causing the
thing to load up, so I installed an after-market needle valve in the
pressure line and adjusted the available pressure to the tank and it seemed
to work quite well.
G.
----- Original Message -----
From: John Pavlick
To: General pattern discussion
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Venus Engine Question
The Perry doesn't require the tank to be pressurized like the Kline
does. On the other hand, I believe the Kline can be run with muffler
pressure to the tank whereas the Perry needs crankcase pressure to the pump.
This can be a pain if you don't feel like tapping the backplate of your
engine. Either system can work very well or very poorly. You'll find that
people will swear by either one but not necessarily both. I personally have
had better luck with the Perry so that's what I use.
John Pavlick
J N Hiller <jnhiller at earthlink.net> wrote:
Jay, how does the Perry pump compare to a Kline?
Jim Hiller
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Jay Marshall
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 7:27 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Venus Engine Question
I used the Perry VP-30 and an APC 15-10 prop.
Jay Marshall
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of William C.
Harden
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 9:55 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Venus Engine Question
Thanks. What prop are you using and what is the Perry Pump model
number that you are using?
Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jay Marshall
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 8:34 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Venus Engine Question
I added ½ oz. It will depend how heavy your servos are. I used a
different fuel tank and moved it back to the wing tube to keep the CG
constant. This necessitated a Perry pump.
Jay Marshall
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of William C.
Harden
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 9:16 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Venus Engine Question
Jay,
Did you have to add weight to the tail to balance the plane? If so,
how much weight did you add?
Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jay Marshall
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 6:53 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Venus Engine Question
I use the stock muffler. The engine is mounted so that the muffler
is at the bottom of the fuse. This puts the head at appx 8 o’clock.
Jay Marshall
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of William C.
Harden
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 10:20 PM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Venus Engine Question
Jay,
Are you using the stock muffler on the AX or something different?
Bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jay Marshall
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 7:24 PM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Venus Engine Question
Sound doesn’t win! Go with the AX – lots more power, more reliable.
(I have both – and a Venus)
Jay Marshall
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Terry
Beachler
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 8:19 PM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Venus Engine Question
Hi Flyers,
I am planning to build a Venus II. The OS 120AX is suggested and
also O.S. 120 Surpass 4C. Any thoughts from the group on choice. I'll be
flying Sportsman. My buddy goofy Bob Wilson leans toward the 120AX. I am
somewhat partial to 4 strokes. I like that V-8 sound and low end torque.
Terry Beachler
Buzz jobs should be targeted to the windsock at: N 40 49.944 W 89
33.230
Visit the PRCM web site at: www.peoriarcmodelers.com
Map link to old field: http://tinyurl.com/5wys9l
Map link to new field: http://tinyurl.com/29b7gm
Four Star Racing Series: http://fourstarracingseries.com
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 10728 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter for free now!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.134 / Virus Database: 270.4.4/1532 - Release Date: 7/3/2008
8:32 AM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080705/067a136e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list