[NSRCA-discussion] Mailing list etiquette reminder

[Robert Harden]

Let it go!!!

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <rcmaster199 at aol.com>
To: <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Mailing list etiquette reminder


> IT WASN'T SOMEONE.....IT WAS ME.
> 
> YOU KNOW WHO I AM
> 
> MATT K
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Woodward, Jim (US SSA) <jim.woodward at baesystems.com>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 8:23 pm
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Mailing list etiquette reminder
> 
> Guys,
> 
> One of the things about the internet is that facial expressions or 
> tones of voice do not make it across.  I am just checking email from 
> home and do not see the D3 VP messages, except for Bryan's which was 
> copied to my individual email address.  So, I am going to try and 
> synthesize some notes based on phone calls I received.
> 
> As to any agenda - you are right - I have one:  It is to improve the 
> District.  Voluntarily dragging my own name into such heated issues, 
> giving amunition to national-smear-campaigns & other derogatory talk, 
> is "clearly" not a course of action that leads to beating anyone or 
> achieving really nice scores, so please drop this simpeton-conspiracy 
> that "everything" thing I've said is just to beat Jason.
> 
>>From what I was told, and from reading Bryan's note, there is in fact 
> some constructive points I can personally take away from this and use 
> to better myself.  Thank you for that.  Anyone that knows me, knows 
> that I look "in" before "out."
> 
> For as much as I can take away from this, it is also worth pointing out 
> that when you bring up issues like: transparency, fairness, bias - some 
> people react as if holy-water had been thrown on a vampire.  Those 
> issues were also brought up in some letters sent regarding this 
> appointment.  Therefore, if you read the letters, please be 
> intellectually honest and recognize that a few others felt that same 
> way, and no longer promote the idea that I am the only one.  These 
> feelings span from north to south, east to west, plane to plane, group 
> to group.
> 
> Someone mentioned my note read as a threat (regarding people spending 
> their time other ways)????  I can't even respond to that.
> 
> Respectfully,
> Jim W.
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org on behalf of krishlan 
> fitzsimmons
> Sent: Thu 7/3/2008 11:18 PM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Mailing list etiquette reminder
> 
> 
> Wait, these are toy planes??
> 
> 
> 
> Holy crap.. Don't tell my wife..  
> <http://webmail.na.baesystems.com/dana-cached/help/empty.html>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Thu, 7/3/08, Tom Simes <simestd at netexpress.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>    From: Tom Simes <simestd at netexpress.com>
>    Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Mailing list etiquette reminder
>    To: "NSRCA discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>    Date: Thursday, July 3, 2008, 3:33 PM
> 
> 
>    Hello everyone,
> 
>    It looks like the annual etiquette reminder may be overdue.
> 
>    I am the current NSRCA list administrator and the rules I run the
>    list by are simple:
> 
>    1. I own the mailing list server, but it is administered at the
>    direction of the NSRCA leadership.
> 
>    2. The occasional teasing, banter, reasoned debate and "flame wars"
>    are
>     part of the exchange, but personal attacks are not appropriate and 
> will
>    not be tolerated.
> 
>     As far as I am concerned, the only valid reasons to take 
> administrative
>    action against a list user are continued and deliberate abuse of the
>     service, the server or other list members.  While I have been 
> hosting
>    the list, it hasn't been necessary to remove anyone because of their
>    behavior and I would very much like to keep it that way.
> 
>     Some recent posts have obviously been over the line on rule #2.  
> Please
>    refrain from further accusatory posts and take the D3 VP thread off
>    list.
> 
>    Thank you, now raise your right hands and repeat:
> 
>    These are TOY airplanes, this is supposed to be FUN......
> 
>    Tom
> 
>     
> ======================================================================
>       "Z-80 system stack overflow.  Shut 'er down Scotty, the
>    system's
>             sucking mud" - Error message on TRS 80 Model-16B
> 
>     Tom Simes                                       
> simestd at netexpress.com
>     
> ======================================================================
>    _______________________________________________
>    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion