[NSRCA-discussion] Altitude limits

[Del Rykert]

Thanks Ron... 
 
    Del
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: ronlock at comcast.net 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:54 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Altitude limits


  That sort of operational concept question has been an FAA subject for years and is of course evolving rapidly.   There is a huge amount of detail and definition of terms involved in this area.

  But short answer is yes.
  Ron Lockhart

    -------------- Original message -------------- 
    From: "Del Rykert" <drykert2 at rochester.rr.com> 

    Do UAV's get permission and follow ground control commands  if entering controlled airspace? 

        Del
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Bob Richards 
      To: NSRCA Mailing List 
      Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 8:03 AM
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Altitude limits


      I know that the AOPA is watching the UAV issue very closely. They seem to be dead set against UAVs sharing controlled airspace with normal aircraft, unless separation can be insured.

      Ed White <edvwhite at sbcglobal.net> wrote: 
        Arch,

        I also work with UAV projects.  Up until recently it was a grey area and different FAA field offices offered their own interpretation of this AC with regard to UAV's.  In the last year or so we were told was a more formal interpretation from FAA headquarters that said this AC covers only model airplanes flown by hobbyists and it can not be applied to UAV's or model aircraft flown for commercial purposes.  The commercial purposes was key.

        You are correct that the FAA is developing rules for UAV's flown for commercial purposes (and have been developing such rules for at least 4-5 years that I know of, probably longer).  The AC has existed for over 25 years and has had little effect on us.  Very few flyers know it even exists.  I think you are right on the money that it is up to us to be smart and careful so that when the new rul! es fina lly do come out, they won't restrict us excessively.

        Ed




--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080122/872d55ca/attachment.html